Griffith CityEconomic profile

Have you noticed that pages have moved around? We've updated the structure of economic profile to make it easier to find what you need. Read the full list of changes

Skip to content

Griffith City

Resident workers (Local) - Method of travel to work

The local labour force in Griffith City have a lower proportion of people using public transport to get to work than New South Wales.

Maximising access to employment is a key objective in any economic development strategy. Understanding the modes of transport Griffith City's local resident workers use (either within or outside the local area), informs decision-makers about the effectiveness of transport modes, routes and availability of local public transport.

There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:

  • The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work;
  • The number of motor vehicles available within a household; and
  • The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.

Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with Residents place of work and for a clearer picture of where working residents are employed.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2006 and 2011 – by place of work

Local resident workers method of travel to work
Griffith City 20112006Change
Main method of travelNumber%New South Wales %Number%New South Wales %2006 to 2011
Car, as driver7,70268.757.67,26865.756.4+434
Car, as passenger8207.35.08457.65.7-25
Train00.06.200.05.40
Train and Car00.01.200.01.20
Train and other00.01.500.01.30
Train and multiple other methods00.00.400.00.30
Bus280.23.7650.63.4-37
Bus and car00.00.340.00.2-4
Bus and other (not train)00.00.130.00.1-3
Bus and two other methods (excluding train)00.00.000.00.00
Ferry00.00.200.00.20
Tram00.00.000.00.00
Truck1321.21.21811.61.6-49
Motorbike/Motor scooter600.50.6960.90.6-36
Bicycle630.60.7840.80.7-21
Taxi/Other1301.20.81531.40.8-23
Other - multiple methods560.50.7440.40.5+12
Walked only4714.24.14914.44.4-20
Worked at home5234.74.66315.74.8-108
Did not go to work9908.89.59888.910.5+2
Not stated2412.11.52141.91.9+27

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2006 and 2011. Compiled and presented by .id , the population experts.

Local resident workers method of travel to work, 2011
Local resident workers method of travel to work, 2011 Car, as driver, New South Wales: 57.6% Car, as passenger, New South Wales: 5.0% Train, New South Wales: 6.2% Train and Car, New South Wales: 1.2% Train and other, New South Wales: 1.5% Train and multiple other methods, New South Wales: 0.4% Bus, New South Wales: 3.7% Bus and car, New South Wales: 0.3% Bus and other (not train), New South Wales: 0.1% Bus and two other methods (excluding train), New South Wales: 0.0% Ferry, New South Wales: 0.2% Tram, New South Wales: 0.0% Truck, New South Wales: 1.2% Motorbike/Motor scooter, New South Wales: 0.6% Bicycle, New South Wales: 0.7% Taxi/Other, New South Wales: 0.8% Other - multiple methods, New South Wales: 0.7% Worked at home, New South Wales: 4.6% Did not go to work, New South Wales: 9.5% Not stated, New South Wales: 1.5% Car, as driver, Griffith City: 68.7% Car, as passenger, Griffith City: 7.3% Train, Griffith City: 0.0% Train and Car, Griffith City: 0.0% Train and other, Griffith City: 0.0% Train and multiple other methods, Griffith City: 0.0% Bus, Griffith City: 0.2% Bus and car, Griffith City: 0.0% Bus and other (not train), Griffith City: 0.0% Bus and two other methods (excluding train), Griffith City: 0.0% Ferry, Griffith City: 0.0% Tram, Griffith City: 0.0% Truck, Griffith City: 1.2% Motorbike/Motor scooter, Griffith City: 0.5% Bicycle, Griffith City: 0.6% Taxi/Other, Griffith City: 1.2% Other - multiple methods, Griffith City: 0.5% Worked at home, Griffith City: 4.7% Did not go to work, Griffith City: 8.8% Not stated, Griffith City: 2.1%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2011
Compiled and presented in economy.id by .id, the population experts.
Change in local resident workers method of travel to work, 2006 to 2011
Change in local resident workers method of travel to work, 2006 to 2011 Car, as driver, Griffith City: +434 Car, as passenger, Griffith City: -25 Train, Griffith City: 0 Train and Car, Griffith City: 0 Train and other, Griffith City: 0 Train and multiple other methods, Griffith City: 0 Bus, Griffith City: -37 Bus and car, Griffith City: -4 Bus and other (not train), Griffith City: -3 Bus and two other methods (excluding train), Griffith City: 0 Ferry, Griffith City: 0 Tram, Griffith City: 0 Truck, Griffith City: -49 Motorbike/Motor scooter, Griffith City: -36 Bicycle, Griffith City: -21 Taxi/Other, Griffith City: -23 Other - multiple methods, Griffith City: +12 Worked at home, Griffith City: -108 Did not go to work, Griffith City: +2 Not stated, Griffith City: +27
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2006 and 2011
Compiled and presented in economy.id by .id, the population experts.

Dominant groups

In 2011, there were 28 people in the local resident workers who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in Griffith City, compared with 8,654 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).

Analysis of the method of travel to work of the local labour force in Griffith City shows that 0.2% used public transport, while 77.2% used a private vehicle, compared with 13.6% and 63.9% respectively in New South Wales.

The major differences between the method of travel to work of the local labour force in Griffith City and New South Wales were:

  • A larger percentage of local labour force who travelled to work by Car, as driver (68.7% compared to 57.6%)
  • A larger percentage of local labour force who travelled to work by Car, as passenger (7.3% compared to 5.0%)
  • A smaller percentage of local labour force who travelled to work by Train (0.0% compared to 6.2%)
  • A smaller percentage of local labour force who travelled to work by Bus (0.2% compared to 3.7%)

Emerging groups

The largest changes in the method of travel of work of the local labour force in Griffith City between 2006 and 2011 were:

  • Car, as driver (+434 local labour force)
  • Worked at home (-108 local labour force)
  • Truck (-49 local labour force)
  • Bus (-37 local labour force)

To continue building your economic story go to...

v16.07.05-1.0.8