Griffith CityEconomic profile

Have you noticed that pages have moved around? We've updated the structure of economic profile to make it easier to find what you need. Read the full list of changes

Skip to content

Griffith City

Local workers - Method of travel to work - All industries

Within Griffith City, the have a lower proportion of people using public transport to get to work than New South Wales.

This data reveals the main modes of transport used by local workers in a particular industry to get to work. Workforce transport data for Griffith City is very useful in transport planning as it informs decision-makers about the effectiveness and availability of public transport.

There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:

  • The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work (For instance, industries located near railway stations are likely to have higher public transport use than those located away from main public transport routes);
  • The number of motor vehicles available from within a household; and
  • The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.

Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with Workers pace of residence and Residents Place of work for a clearer picture of where people come from to work in the Griffith City, and Employment locations for the Destination Zones they work in and how they arrive there.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2006 and 2011 – by place of work

Local workers method of travel to work
Griffith City - All industries20112006Change
Main method of travelNumber%New South Wales %Number%New South Wales %2006 to 2011
Car, as driver7,46870.457.97,04766.956.8+421
Car, as passenger7186.85.07827.45.6-64
Train00.06.230.05.4-3
Train and Car00.01.300.01.30
Train and other00.01.600.01.30
Train and multiple other methods00.00.400.00.30
Bus300.33.7450.43.5-15
Bus and car30.00.360.10.2-3
Bus and other (not train)00.00.130.00.1-3
Bus and two other methods (excluding train)00.00.000.00.00
Ferry00.00.200.00.20
Tram00.00.000.00.00
Truck980.91.21521.41.6-54
Motorbike/Motor scooter540.50.6920.90.6-38
Bicycle560.50.8810.80.7-25
Taxi/Other1141.10.71331.30.8-19
Other - multiple methods480.50.6420.40.5+6
Walked only4434.24.14684.44.5-25
Worked at home5064.84.75935.64.9-87
Did not go to work9448.99.69639.110.5-19
Not stated1231.21.01201.11.1+3

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2006 and 2011. Compiled and presented by .id , the population experts.

Local workers method of travel to work, 2011
Local workers method of travel to work, 2011 Car, as driver, New South Wales: 57.9% Car, as passenger, New South Wales: 5.0% Train, New South Wales: 6.2% Train and Car, New South Wales: 1.3% Train and other, New South Wales: 1.6% Train and multiple other methods, New South Wales: 0.4% Bus, New South Wales: 3.7% Bus and car, New South Wales: 0.3% Bus and other (not train), New South Wales: 0.1% Bus and two other methods (excluding train), New South Wales: 0.0% Ferry, New South Wales: 0.2% Tram, New South Wales: 0.0% Truck, New South Wales: 1.2% Motorbike/Motor scooter, New South Wales: 0.6% Bicycle, New South Wales: 0.8% Taxi/Other, New South Wales: 0.7% Other - multiple methods, New South Wales: 0.6% Worked at home, New South Wales: 4.7% Did not go to work, New South Wales: 9.6% Not stated, New South Wales: 1.0% Car, as driver, Griffith City: 70.4% Car, as passenger, Griffith City: 6.8% Train, Griffith City: 0.0% Train and Car, Griffith City: 0.0% Train and other, Griffith City: 0.0% Train and multiple other methods, Griffith City: 0.0% Bus, Griffith City: 0.3% Bus and car, Griffith City: 0.0% Bus and other (not train), Griffith City: 0.0% Bus and two other methods (excluding train), Griffith City: 0.0% Ferry, Griffith City: 0.0% Tram, Griffith City: 0.0% Truck, Griffith City: 0.9% Motorbike/Motor scooter, Griffith City: 0.5% Bicycle, Griffith City: 0.5% Taxi/Other, Griffith City: 1.1% Other - multiple methods, Griffith City: 0.5% Worked at home, Griffith City: 4.8% Did not go to work, Griffith City: 8.9% Not stated, Griffith City: 1.2%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2011
Compiled and presented in economy.id by .id, the population experts.
Change in local workers method of travel to work, 2006 to 2011
Change in local workers method of travel to work, 2006 to 2011 Car, as driver, Griffith City: +421 Car, as passenger, Griffith City: -64 Train, Griffith City: -3 Train and Car, Griffith City: 0 Train and other, Griffith City: 0 Train and multiple other methods, Griffith City: 0 Bus, Griffith City: -15 Bus and car, Griffith City: -3 Bus and other (not train), Griffith City: -3 Bus and two other methods (excluding train), Griffith City: 0 Ferry, Griffith City: 0 Tram, Griffith City: 0 Truck, Griffith City: -54 Motorbike/Motor scooter, Griffith City: -38 Bicycle, Griffith City: -25 Taxi/Other, Griffith City: -19 Other - multiple methods, Griffith City: +6 Worked at home, Griffith City: -87 Did not go to work, Griffith City: -19 Not stated, Griffith City: +3
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2006 and 2011
Compiled and presented in economy.id by .id, the population experts.

Dominant groups

In 2011, there were 33 people in the who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in Griffith City, compared with 8,284 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).

Analysis of the method of travel to work of the in Griffith City in 2011 compared to New South Wales shows that 0.3% used public transport, while 78.1% used a private vehicle, compared with 13.8% and 64.1% respectively in New South Wales.

The major differences between the method of travel to work of the in Griffith City and New South Wales were:

  • A larger percentage of local workers who travelled by car (as driver) (70.4% compared to 57.9%)
  • A larger percentage of local workers who travelled by car (as a passenger) (6.8% compared to 5.0%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who travelled by train (0.0% compared to 6.2%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who travelled by bus (0.3% compared to 3.7%)

Emerging groups

The largest changes in the method of travel of work of the in Griffith City between 2006 and 2011 were:

  • Car, as driver (+421 local workers)
  • Worked at home (-87 local workers)
  • Car, as passenger (-64 local workers)
  • Truck (-54 local workers)

v16.07.05-1.0.8