City of Tea Tree Gully
Resident workers (Local) - Individual income
The City of Tea Tree Gully local resident workers have a lower proportion of people with high incomes ($1500 or more per week) than Greater Adelaide.
The Individual Income levels of the local resident workers are directly linked to their knowledge, experience, qualifications, occupation and skill levels.
Income statistics in City of Tea Tree Gully, when analysed with other data sources, such as Age structure, Qualifications, Hours worked and Occupations, help to evaluate the economic opportunities and socio-economic status of City of Tea Tree Gully. This also indicates what knowledge and skill levels industry can draw upon locally.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2006 and 2011 – by usual residence
|Local resident workers individual income|
|City of Tea Tree Gully||2011|
|Gross weekly individual income||Number||%||Greater Adelaide %|
|Negative Income/ Nil income||320||0.7||0.8||3001|
|$2,000 or more||2,598||5.4||7.2||3011|
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing (opens a new window) 2011. Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id (opens a new window), the population experts.
Compiled and presented in economy.id by .id, the population experts.
Analysis of the local labour force individual income levels in the City of Tea Tree Gully in 2011 compared to Greater Adelaide shows that there was a lower proportion earning a high income (those earning $1,500 per week or more) and a similar proportion of low income persons (those earning less than $400 per week).
Overall, 15.4% of the local labour force earned a high income, and 16.1% earned a low income, compared with 16.9% and 16.4% respectively for Greater Adelaide.
The major differences between the weekly income of the local labour force in the City of Tea Tree Gully and Greater Adelaide were:
- A larger percentage of local labour force who earned $1,000-$1,249 (14.6% compared to 13.3%)
- A larger percentage of local labour force who earned $800-$999 (15.2% compared to 14.2%)
- A larger percentage of local labour force who earned $1,250-$1,499 (9.4% compared to 8.9%)
- A smaller percentage of local labour force who earned $2,000 or more (5.4% compared to 7.2%)