City of AdelaideEconomic profile
Skip to content

City of Adelaide

Local workers - Method of travel to work - Professional, Scientific and Technical Services

Within the City of Adelaide, there is a higher proportion of local Professional, Scientific and Technical Services workers using public transport to get to work than South Australia.

This data reveals the main modes of transport used by local workers in a particular industry to get to work. Workforce transport data for the City of Adelaide is very useful in transport planning as it informs decision-makers about the effectiveness and availability of public transport.

There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:

  • The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work (For instance, industries located near railway stations are likely to have higher public transport use than those located away from main public transport routes);
  • The number of motor vehicles available from within a household; and
  • The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.

Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with Workers pace of residence and Residents Place of work for a clearer picture of where people come from to work in the the City of Adelaide, and Employment locations for the Destination Zones they work in and how they arrive there.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2011 (experimental imputed) & 2016 – by place of work

Please note – The 2016 Census used a new methodology to “impute” a work location to people who didn’t state their workplace address. As a result, 2016 and 2011 place of work data are not normally comparable. To allow comparison between 2011 and 2016, .id has sourced a 2011 dataset from the ABS which was experimentally imputed using the same methodology. To provide this detail, City of Adelaide in 2011 had to be constructed from a best fit of Work Destination Zones (DZNs). While it may not be an exact match to the LGA or region boundary, it is considered close enough to allow some comparison. Users should treat this time series data with caution, however, and not compare directly with 2011 data from any other source.

Local workers method of travel to work
City of Adelaide - Professional, Scientific and Technical Services20162011Change
Main method of travelNumber%South Australia %Number%South Australia %2011 to 2016
Car, as driver6,00241.456.06,14441.256.1-142
Car, as passenger9116.33.71,2058.14.8-294
Train1,2038.33.51,0807.23.1+123
Bus3,03520.98.53,12921.09.0-94
Ferry60.00.000.00.0+6
Tram3792.61.03102.10.8+69
Truck00.00.030.00.0-3
Motorbike/Motor scooter1300.90.61100.70.5+20
Bicycle5413.71.94463.01.7+95
Taxi/Other280.20.2420.30.2-14
Other - multiple methods3302.31.62801.91.6+50
Walked only5984.12.86934.63.2-95
Worked at home3402.312.82871.910.7+53
Did not go to work9566.67.01,0897.37.7-133
Not stated330.20.4870.60.6-54

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2011 and 2016. Compiled and presented by .id , the population experts.

Local workers method of travel to work, 2016
Local workers method of travel to work, 2016 Car, as driver, South Australia: 56.0% Car, as passenger, South Australia: 3.7% Train, South Australia: 3.5% Bus, South Australia: 8.5% Ferry, South Australia: 0.0% Tram, South Australia: 1.0% Truck, South Australia: 0.0% Motorbike/Motor scooter, South Australia: 0.6% Bicycle, South Australia: 1.9% Taxi/Other, South Australia: 0.2% Other - multiple methods, South Australia: 1.6% Worked at home, South Australia: 12.8% Did not go to work, South Australia: 7.0% Not stated, South Australia: 0.4% Car, as driver, City of Adelaide: 41.4% Car, as passenger, City of Adelaide: 6.3% Train, City of Adelaide: 8.3% Bus, City of Adelaide: 20.9% Ferry, City of Adelaide: 0.0% Tram, City of Adelaide: 2.6% Truck, City of Adelaide: 0.0% Motorbike/Motor scooter, City of Adelaide: 0.9% Bicycle, City of Adelaide: 3.7% Taxi/Other, City of Adelaide: 0.2% Other - multiple methods, City of Adelaide: 2.3% Worked at home, City of Adelaide: 2.3% Did not go to work, City of Adelaide: 6.6% Not stated, City of Adelaide: 0.2%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2016
Compiled and presented in economy.id by .id, the population experts.
Change in local workers method of travel to work, 2011 to 2016
Change in local workers method of travel to work, 2011 to 2016 Car, as driver, City of Adelaide: -142 Car, as passenger, City of Adelaide: -294 Train, City of Adelaide: +123 Bus, City of Adelaide: -94 Ferry, City of Adelaide: +6 Tram, City of Adelaide: +69 Truck, City of Adelaide: -3 Motorbike/Motor scooter, City of Adelaide: +20 Bicycle, City of Adelaide: +95 Taxi/Other, City of Adelaide: -14 Other - multiple methods, City of Adelaide: +50 Worked at home, City of Adelaide: +53 Did not go to work, City of Adelaide: -133 Not stated, City of Adelaide: -54
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2011 and 2016
Compiled and presented in economy.id by .id, the population experts.

Dominant groups

In 2016, there were 4,244 people in the Professional, Scientific and Technical Services who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in City of Adelaide, compared with 7,292 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).

Analysis of the method of travel to work of the Professional, Scientific and Technical Services in the City of Adelaide in 2016 compared to South Australia shows that 29.3% used public transport, while 50.3% used a private vehicle, compared with 12.0% and 60.7% respectively in South Australia.

The major differences between the method of travel to work of the Professional, Scientific and Technical Services workforce in the City of Adelaide and South Australia were:

  • A larger percentage of local workers who travelled by bus (20.9% compared to 8.5%)
  • A larger percentage of local workers who travelled by train (8.3% compared to 3.5%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who travelled by car (as driver) (41.4% compared to 56.0%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who worked at home (2.3% compared to 12.8%)

Emerging groups

The largest changes in the method of travel of work of the Professional, Scientific and Technical Services workforce in the City of Adelaide between 2011 and 2016 were:

  • Car, as passenger (-294 local workers)
  • Car, as driver (-142 local workers)
  • Did not go to work (-133 local workers)
  • Train (+123 local workers)

v19.10.16-1.0.0