Bayside CouncilEconomic profile
Skip to content

Bayside Council area

Local workers - Method of travel to work - Professional, Scientific and Technical Services

Within the Bayside Council area, there is a lower proportion of local Professional, Scientific and Technical Services workers using public transport to get to work than New South Wales.

This data reveals the main modes of transport used by local workers in a particular industry to get to work. Workforce transport data for the Bayside Council area is very useful in transport planning as it informs decision-makers about the effectiveness and availability of public transport.

There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:

  • The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work (For instance, industries located near railway stations are likely to have higher public transport use than those located away from main public transport routes);
  • The number of motor vehicles available from within a household; and
  • The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.

Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with Workers pace of residence and Residents Place of work for a clearer picture of where people come from to work in the the Bayside Council area, and Employment locations for the Destination Zones they work in and how they arrive there.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2011 (experimental imputed) & 2016 – by place of work

Please note – The 2016 Census used a new methodology to “impute” a work location to people who didn’t state their workplace address. As a result, 2016 and 2011 place of work data are not normally comparable. To allow comparison between 2011 and 2016, .id has sourced a 2011 dataset from the ABS which was experimentally imputed using the same methodology. To provide this detail, Bayside Council area in 2011 had to be constructed from a best fit of Work Destination Zones (DZNs). While it may not be an exact match to the LGA or region boundary, it is considered close enough to allow some comparison. Users should treat this time series data with caution, however, and not compare directly with 2011 data from any other source.

Local workers method of travel to work
Bayside Council area - Professional, Scientific and Technical Services20162011Change
Main method of travelNumber%New South Wales %Number%New South Wales %2011 to 2016
Car, as driver1,50246.137.01,52554.141.7-23
Car, as passenger772.42.2843.02.9-7
Train67720.824.340414.319.2+273
Bus993.08.8762.78.3+23
Ferry00.00.800.00.80
Tram00.00.200.00.10
Truck30.10.100.00.1+3
Motorbike/Motor scooter250.80.8170.60.8+8
Bicycle290.91.1291.01.20
Taxi/Other90.30.330.10.4+6
Other - multiple methods411.31.1331.21.2+8
Walked only1294.04.61043.74.8+25
Worked at home48514.912.735612.611.7+129
Did not go to work1715.35.61665.96.3+5
Not stated100.30.4200.70.6-10

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2011 and 2016. Compiled and presented by .id , the population experts.

Local workers method of travel to work, 2016
Local workers method of travel to work, 2016 Car, as driver, New South Wales: 37.0% Car, as passenger, New South Wales: 2.2% Train, New South Wales: 24.3% Bus, New South Wales: 8.8% Ferry, New South Wales: 0.8% Tram, New South Wales: 0.2% Truck, New South Wales: 0.1% Motorbike/Motor scooter, New South Wales: 0.8% Bicycle, New South Wales: 1.1% Taxi/Other, New South Wales: 0.3% Other - multiple methods, New South Wales: 1.1% Worked at home, New South Wales: 12.7% Did not go to work, New South Wales: 5.6% Not stated, New South Wales: 0.4% Car, as driver, Bayside Council area: 46.1% Car, as passenger, Bayside Council area: 2.4% Train, Bayside Council area: 20.8% Bus, Bayside Council area: 3.0% Ferry, Bayside Council area: 0.0% Tram, Bayside Council area: 0.0% Truck, Bayside Council area: 0.1% Motorbike/Motor scooter, Bayside Council area: 0.8% Bicycle, Bayside Council area: 0.9% Taxi/Other, Bayside Council area: 0.3% Other - multiple methods, Bayside Council area: 1.3% Worked at home, Bayside Council area: 14.9% Did not go to work, Bayside Council area: 5.3% Not stated, Bayside Council area: 0.3%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2016
Compiled and presented in economy.id by .id, the population experts.
Change in local workers method of travel to work, 2011 to 2016
Change in local workers method of travel to work, 2011 to 2016 Car, as driver, Bayside Council area: -23 Car, as passenger, Bayside Council area: -7 Train, Bayside Council area: +273 Bus, Bayside Council area: +23 Ferry, Bayside Council area: 0 Tram, Bayside Council area: 0 Truck, Bayside Council area: +3 Motorbike/Motor scooter, Bayside Council area: +8 Bicycle, Bayside Council area: 0 Taxi/Other, Bayside Council area: +6 Other - multiple methods, Bayside Council area: +8 Worked at home, Bayside Council area: +129 Did not go to work, Bayside Council area: +5 Not stated, Bayside Council area: -10
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2011 and 2016
Compiled and presented in economy.id by .id, the population experts.

Dominant groups

In 2016, there were 776 people in the Professional, Scientific and Technical Services who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in Bayside Council area, compared with 1,582 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).

Analysis of the method of travel to work of the Professional, Scientific and Technical Services in the Bayside Council area in 2016 compared to New South Wales shows that 23.8% used public transport, while 48.6% used a private vehicle, compared with 33.9% and 39.5% respectively in New South Wales.

The major differences between the method of travel to work of the Professional, Scientific and Technical Services workforce in the Bayside Council area and New South Wales were:

  • A larger percentage of local workers who travelled by car (as driver) (46.1% compared to 37.0%)
  • A larger percentage of local workers who worked at home (14.9% compared to 12.7%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who travelled by bus (3.0% compared to 8.8%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who travelled by train (20.8% compared to 24.3%)

Emerging groups

The largest changes in the method of travel of work of the Professional, Scientific and Technical Services workforce in the Bayside Council area between 2011 and 2016 were:

  • Train (+273 local workers)
  • Worked at home (+129 local workers)
  • Walked only (+25 local workers)
  • Car, as driver (-23 local workers)

v19.10.16-1.0.0