Cardinia ShireEconomic profile
Skip to content

Cardinia Shire

Local workers - Method of travel to work - All industries

Within Cardinia Shire, the have a lower proportion of people using public transport to get to work than Victoria.

This data reveals the main modes of transport used by local workers in a particular industry to get to work. Workforce transport data for Cardinia Shire is very useful in transport planning as it informs decision-makers about the effectiveness and availability of public transport.

There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:

  • The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work (For instance, industries located near railway stations are likely to have higher public transport use than those located away from main public transport routes);
  • The number of motor vehicles available from within a household; and
  • The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.

Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with Workers pace of residence and Residents Place of work for a clearer picture of where people come from to work in the Cardinia Shire, and Employment locations for the Destination Zones they work in and how they arrive there.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2016 – by place of work

Please note: Currently only 2016 data are available for work destination. 2011 data are not comparable due to a change in methodology in 2016 which “imputed” a work destination to those workers who didn’t state their work destination. This means comparisons with earlier years should not be made. .id are currently sourcing data collected under the same methodology in 2011 which will be added to this page at a later date. For a detailed case study of this issue please visit our blog post.

Local workers method of travel to work
Cardinia Shire - All industries2016
Main method of travelNumber%Victoria %
Car, as driver15,83668.461.9
Car, as passenger1,2625.54.0
Motorbike/Motor scooter540.20.4
Other - multiple methods2531.11.2
Walked only5322.33.2
Worked at home1,9758.54.6
Did not go to work2,2559.79.3
Not stated2381.01.0

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2011 and 2016. Compiled and presented by .id , the population experts.

Local workers method of travel to work, 2016
Local workers method of travel to work, 2016 Car, as driver, Victoria: 61.9% Car, as passenger, Victoria: 4.0% Train, Victoria: 9.2% Bus, Victoria: 1.3% Ferry, Victoria: 0.0% Tram, Victoria: 1.9% Truck, Victoria: 0.6% Motorbike/Motor scooter, Victoria: 0.4% Bicycle, Victoria: 1.2% Taxi/Other, Victoria: 0.2% Other - multiple methods, Victoria: 1.2% Worked at home, Victoria: 4.6% Did not go to work, Victoria: 9.3% Not stated, Victoria: 1.0% Car, as driver, Cardinia Shire: 68.4% Car, as passenger, Cardinia Shire: 5.5% Train, Cardinia Shire: 1.2% Bus, Cardinia Shire: 0.5% Ferry, Cardinia Shire: 0.0% Tram, Cardinia Shire: 0.0% Truck, Cardinia Shire: 1.1% Motorbike/Motor scooter, Cardinia Shire: 0.2% Bicycle, Cardinia Shire: 0.3% Taxi/Other, Cardinia Shire: 0.1% Other - multiple methods, Cardinia Shire: 1.1% Worked at home, Cardinia Shire: 8.5% Did not go to work, Cardinia Shire: 9.7% Not stated, Cardinia Shire: 1.0%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2016
Compiled and presented in by .id, the population experts.

Dominant groups

In 2016, there were 407 people in the who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in Cardinia Shire, compared with 17,346 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).

Analysis of the method of travel to work of the in Cardinia Shire in 2016 compared to Victoria shows that 1.8% used public transport, while 75.0% used a private vehicle, compared with 10.5% and 68.4% respectively in Victoria.

The major differences between the method of travel to work of the in Cardinia Shire and Victoria were:

  • A larger percentage of local workers who travelled by car (as driver) (68.4% compared to 61.9%)
  • A larger percentage of local workers who worked at home (8.5% compared to 4.6%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who travelled by train (1.2% compared to 9.2%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who travelled by tram (0.0% compared to 1.9%)