Cradle Coast RegionEconomic profile
Skip to content

Circular Head Council area

Local workers - Method of travel to work - All industries

Within Circular Head Council area, there is a lower proportion of local workers using public transport to get to work than Tasmania.

This data reveals the main modes of transport used by local workers in a particular industry to get to work. Workforce transport data for Circular Head Council area is very useful in transport planning as it informs decision-makers about the effectiveness and availability of public transport.

There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:

  • The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work (For instance, industries located near railway stations are likely to have higher public transport use than those located away from main public transport routes);
  • The number of motor vehicles available from within a household; and
  • The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.

Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with Workers pace of residence and Residents Place of work for a clearer picture of where people come from to work in the Circular Head Council area, and Employment locations for the Destination Zones they work in and how they arrive there.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2011 (experimental imputed) & 2016 – by place of work

Please note – The 2016 Census used a new methodology to “impute” a work location to people who didn’t state their workplace address. As a result, 2016 and 2011 place of work data are not normally comparable. To allow comparison between 2011 and 2016, .id has sourced a 2011 dataset from the ABS which was experimentally imputed using the same methodology. To provide this detail, Circular Head Council area in 2011 had to be constructed from a best fit of Work Destination Zones (DZNs). While it may not be an exact match to the LGA or region boundary, it is considered close enough to allow some comparison. Users should treat this time series data with caution, however, and not compare directly with 2011 data from any other source.

Local workers method of travel to work
Circular Head Council area - All industries20162011Change
Main method of travelNumber%Tasmania %Number%Tasmania %2011 to 2016
Car, as driver2,31964.065.52,22162.163.4+98
Car, as passenger2155.95.82075.86.8+8
Train00.00.100.00.00
Bus100.32.8160.43.0-6
Ferry00.00.000.00.00
Tram40.10.000.00.0+4
Truck491.40.8591.60.9-10
Motorbike/Motor scooter862.40.61032.90.5-17
Bicycle30.10.8100.30.6-7
Taxi/Other00.00.300.00.30
Other - multiple methods651.81.3551.51.3+10
Walked only1905.24.82045.75.0-14
Worked at home2617.24.72898.14.5-28
Did not go to work37010.211.63479.712.3+23
Not stated531.51.0681.91.4-15

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2011 and 2016. Compiled and presented by .id , the population experts.

Local workers method of travel to work, 2016
Local workers method of travel to work, 2016 Car, as driver, Tasmania: 65.5% Car, as passenger, Tasmania: 5.8% Train, Tasmania: 0.1% Bus, Tasmania: 2.8% Ferry, Tasmania: 0.0% Tram, Tasmania: 0.0% Truck, Tasmania: 0.8% Motorbike/Motor scooter, Tasmania: 0.6% Bicycle, Tasmania: 0.8% Taxi/Other, Tasmania: 0.3% Other - multiple methods, Tasmania: 1.3% Worked at home, Tasmania: 4.7% Did not go to work, Tasmania: 11.6% Not stated, Tasmania: 1.0% Car, as driver, Circular Head Council area: 64.0% Car, as passenger, Circular Head Council area: 5.9% Train, Circular Head Council area: 0.0% Bus, Circular Head Council area: 0.3% Ferry, Circular Head Council area: 0.0% Tram, Circular Head Council area: 0.1% Truck, Circular Head Council area: 1.4% Motorbike/Motor scooter, Circular Head Council area: 2.4% Bicycle, Circular Head Council area: 0.1% Taxi/Other, Circular Head Council area: 0.0% Other - multiple methods, Circular Head Council area: 1.8% Worked at home, Circular Head Council area: 7.2% Did not go to work, Circular Head Council area: 10.2% Not stated, Circular Head Council area: 1.5%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2016
Compiled and presented in economy.id by .id, the population experts.
Change in local workers method of travel to work, 2011 to 2016
Change in local workers method of travel to work, 2011 to 2016 Car, as driver, Circular Head Council area: +98 Car, as passenger, Circular Head Council area: +8 Train, Circular Head Council area: 0 Bus, Circular Head Council area: -6 Ferry, Circular Head Council area: 0 Tram, Circular Head Council area: +4 Truck, Circular Head Council area: -10 Motorbike/Motor scooter, Circular Head Council area: -17 Bicycle, Circular Head Council area: -7 Taxi/Other, Circular Head Council area: 0 Other - multiple methods, Circular Head Council area: +10 Worked at home, Circular Head Council area: -28 Did not go to work, Circular Head Council area: +23 Not stated, Circular Head Council area: -15
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2011 and 2016
Compiled and presented in economy.id by .id, the population experts.

Dominant groups

In 2016, there were 10 people in the who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in Circular Head Council area, compared with 2,587 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).

Analysis of the method of travel to work of the in Circular Head Council area in 2016 compared to Tasmania shows that 0.3% used public transport, while 71.4% used a private vehicle, compared with 2.9% and 72.1% respectively in Tasmania.

The major differences between the method of travel to work of the workforce in Circular Head Council area and Tasmania were:

  • A larger percentage of local workers who worked at home (7.2% compared to 4.7%)
  • A larger percentage of local workers who travelled by motorbike (2.4% compared to 0.6%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who travelled by bus (0.3% compared to 2.8%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who travelled by car (as driver) (64.0% compared to 65.5%)

Emerging groups

The largest changes in the method of travel of work of the workforce in Circular Head Council area between 2011 and 2016 were:

  • Car, as driver (+98 local workers)
  • Worked at home (-28 local workers)
  • Did not go to work (+23 local workers)
  • Motorbike/Motor scooter (-17 local workers)

v20.2.24-1.0.0