Glenelg Shire
Resident workers - Method of travel to work - All industries
Within Glenelg Shire, there is a lower proportion of resident All industries workers using public transport to get to work than the Victoria workforce.
Maximising access to employment is a key objective in any economic development strategy. Understanding the modes of transport Glenelg Shire's local resident workers use (either within or outside the local area), informs decision-makers about the effectiveness of transport modes, routes and availability of local public transport.
There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:
- The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work;
- The number of motor vehicles available within a household; and
- The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.
Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with resident place of work for a clearer picture of where working residents are employed.
Data source
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2011 (experimental imputed) & 2016 – by place of work
| Resident workers method of travel to work | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glenelg Shire | 2016 | 2011 | Change | ||||||
| Main method of travel | Number | % | Victoria% | Number | % | Victoria% | 2011 - 2016 | ||
| Car, as driver | 5,481 | 66.0 | 61.8 | 5,480 | 62.3 | 61.4 | +1 | ||
| Car, as passenger | 358 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 472 | 5.4 | 4.6 | -114 | ||
| Train | 8 | 0.1 | 9.2 | 7 | 0.1 | 7.9 | +1 | ||
| Bus | 32 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 41 | 0.5 | 1.3 | -9 | ||
| Ferry | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -3 | ||
| Tram | 0 | 0 | 1.9 | 3 | 0.0 | 1.7 | -3 | ||
| Truck | 95 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 99 | 1.1 | 0.8 | -4 | ||
| Motorbike/Motor scooter | 47 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 53 | 0.6 | 0.4 | -6 | ||
| Bicycle | 48 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 58 | 0.7 | 1.2 | -10 | ||
| Taxi/Other | 19 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 12 | 0.1 | 0.2 | +7 | ||
| Other - multiple methods | 110 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 147 | 1.7 | 1.1 | -37 | ||
| Walked only | 354 | 4.3 | 3.2 | 430 | 4.9 | 3.3 | -76 | ||
| Worked at home | 614 | 7.4 | 4.6 | 650 | 7.4 | 4.3 | -36 | ||
| Did not go to work | 1,016 | 12.2 | 9.3 | 1,167 | 13.3 | 10.1 | -151 | ||
| Not stated | 127 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 172 | 2.0 | 1.6 | -45 | ||
| Total | 8,309 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 8,794 | 100.0 | 100.0 | -485 | ||
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2011 and 2016. Compiled and presented by .id the population experts Please refer to specific data notes for more information | |||||||||
Dominant groups
In 2016, there were 40 resident workers who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in Glenelg Shire, compared with 5,981 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).
Analysis of the method of travel to work of the resident workers in Glenelg Shire shows that 0.5% used public transport, while 72.0% used a private vehicle, compared with 12.4% and 66.8% respectively in Victoria.
The major differences between the method of travel to work of the resident workers in Glenelg Shire and the Victoria workforce were:
- A smaller percentage of resident workers who travelled by train (0.1% compared to 9.2%)
- A larger percentage of resident workers who travelled by car, as driver (66.0% compared to 61.8%)
- A larger percentage of resident workers who did not go to work (12.2% compared to 9.3%)
- A larger percentage of resident workers who worked at home (7.4% compared to 4.6%)
Emerging groups
The largest changes in the method of travel to work of the resident workers in Glenelg Shire between 2011 and 2016 were:
- Did not go to work (-151 resident workers)
- Car, as passenger (-114 resident workers)
- Walked only (-76 resident workers)
- Other - multiple methods (-37 resident workers)