City of Launceston

Resident workers - Method of travel to work - All industries

Within the City of Launceston, there is a lower proportion of resident All industries workers using public transport to get to work than the Tasmania workforce.

Maximising access to employment is a key objective in any economic development strategy. Understanding the modes of transport the City of Launceston's local resident workers use (either within or outside the local area), informs decision-makers about the effectiveness of transport modes, routes and availability of local public transport.

There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:

  • The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work;
  • The number of motor vehicles available within a household; and
  • The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.

Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with resident place of work for a clearer picture of where working residents are employed.

Data source

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2011 (experimental imputed) & 2016 – by place of work

Select industry:
Current benchmark:
Resident workers method of travel to work
City of Launceston 20162011Change
Main method of travelNumber%. Tasmania%Number%. Tasmania%2011 - 2016
Car, as driver18,56967.465.318,34164.863.1+228
Car, as passenger1,6856.15.81,9867.06.8-301
Motorbike/Motor scooter1560.60.61590.60.5-3
Other - multiple methods3761.41.33461.21.3+30
Walked only1,5445.64.81,6495.85.0-105
Worked at home9163.34.78793.14.5+37
Did not go to work3,12111.311.73,49612.412.4-375
Not stated2340.81.03811.31.5-147
Total 27,541100.0100.028,306100.0100.0-765

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2011 and 2016. Compiled and presented by .id (informed decisions)

Please refer to specific data notes for more information
loading animation
loading animation

Dominant groups

In 2016, there were 476 resident workers who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in the City of Launceston, compared with 20,529 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).

Analysis of the method of travel to work of the resident workers in the City of Launceston shows that 1.7% used public transport, while 74.5% used a private vehicle, compared with 3.0% and 72.5% respectively in Tasmania.

The major differences between the method of travel to work of the resident workers in the City of Launceston and the Tasmania workforce were:

  • A larger percentage of resident workers who travelled by car, as driver (67.4% compared to 65.3%)
  • A smaller percentage of resident workers who worked at home (3.3% compared to 4.7%)
  • A smaller percentage of resident workers who travelled by bus (1.6% compared to 2.9%)
  • A larger percentage of resident workers who walked only (5.6% compared to 4.8%)

Emerging groups

The largest changes in the method of travel to work of the resident workers in the City of Launceston between 2011 and 2016 were:

  • Did not go to work (-375 resident workers)
  • Car, as passenger (-301 resident workers)
  • Car, as driver (+228 resident workers)
  • Walked only (-105 resident workers)

City of Launceston

economic profile