City of LauncestonEconomic profile
Skip to content

City of Launceston

Local workers - Method of travel to work - Accommodation and Food Services

Within the City of Launceston, there is a lower proportion of local Accommodation and Food Services workers using public transport to get to work than Tasmania.

This data reveals the main modes of transport used by local workers in a particular industry to get to work. Workforce transport data for the City of Launceston is very useful in transport planning as it informs decision-makers about the effectiveness and availability of public transport.

There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:

  • The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work (For instance, industries located near railway stations are likely to have higher public transport use than those located away from main public transport routes);
  • The number of motor vehicles available from within a household; and
  • The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.

Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with Workers pace of residence and Residents Place of work for a clearer picture of where people come from to work in the the City of Launceston, and Employment locations for the Destination Zones they work in and how they arrive there.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2011 (experimental imputed) & 2016 – by place of work

Please note – The 2016 Census used a new methodology to “impute” a work location to people who didn’t state their workplace address. As a result, 2016 and 2011 place of work data are not normally comparable. To allow comparison between 2011 and 2016, .id has sourced a 2011 dataset from the ABS which was experimentally imputed using the same methodology. To provide this detail, City of Launceston in 2011 had to be constructed from a best fit of Work Destination Zones (DZNs). While it may not be an exact match to the LGA or region boundary, it is considered close enough to allow some comparison. Users should treat this time series data with caution, however, and not compare directly with 2011 data from any other source.

Local workers method of travel to work
City of Launceston - Accommodation and Food Services20162011Change
Main method of travelNumber%Tasmania %Number%Tasmania %2011 to 2016
Car, as driver1,45852.248.61,25646.247.1+202
Car, as passenger38113.610.838114.010.60
Train00.00.030.10.0-3
Bus1194.35.31344.95.0-15
Ferry00.00.000.00.00
Tram00.00.000.00.00
Truck00.00.100.00.10
Motorbike/Motor scooter281.00.9150.60.4+13
Bicycle140.50.6160.60.6-2
Taxi/Other250.90.5170.60.4+8
Other - multiple methods361.31.2321.21.2+4
Walked only2127.69.62358.69.8-23
Worked at home361.33.3511.93.6-15
Did not go to work47417.018.354620.119.8-72
Not stated100.40.7351.31.5-25

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2011 and 2016. Compiled and presented by .id , the population experts.

Local workers method of travel to work, 2016
Local workers method of travel to work, 2016 Car, as driver, Tasmania: 48.6% Car, as passenger, Tasmania: 10.8% Train, Tasmania: 0.0% Bus, Tasmania: 5.3% Ferry, Tasmania: 0.0% Tram, Tasmania: 0.0% Truck, Tasmania: 0.1% Motorbike/Motor scooter, Tasmania: 0.9% Bicycle, Tasmania: 0.6% Taxi/Other, Tasmania: 0.5% Other - multiple methods, Tasmania: 1.2% Worked at home, Tasmania: 3.3% Did not go to work, Tasmania: 18.3% Not stated, Tasmania: 0.7% Car, as driver, City of Launceston: 52.2% Car, as passenger, City of Launceston: 13.6% Train, City of Launceston: 0.0% Bus, City of Launceston: 4.3% Ferry, City of Launceston: 0.0% Tram, City of Launceston: 0.0% Truck, City of Launceston: 0.0% Motorbike/Motor scooter, City of Launceston: 1.0% Bicycle, City of Launceston: 0.5% Taxi/Other, City of Launceston: 0.9% Other - multiple methods, City of Launceston: 1.3% Worked at home, City of Launceston: 1.3% Did not go to work, City of Launceston: 17.0% Not stated, City of Launceston: 0.4%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2016
Compiled and presented in economy.id by .id, the population experts.
Change in local workers method of travel to work, 2011 to 2016
Change in local workers method of travel to work, 2011 to 2016 Car, as driver, City of Launceston: +202 Car, as passenger, City of Launceston: 0 Train, City of Launceston: -3 Bus, City of Launceston: -15 Ferry, City of Launceston: 0 Tram, City of Launceston: 0 Truck, City of Launceston: 0 Motorbike/Motor scooter, City of Launceston: +13 Bicycle, City of Launceston: -2 Taxi/Other, City of Launceston: +8 Other - multiple methods, City of Launceston: +4 Worked at home, City of Launceston: -15 Did not go to work, City of Launceston: -72 Not stated, City of Launceston: -25
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2011 and 2016
Compiled and presented in economy.id by .id, the population experts.

Dominant groups

In 2016, there were 119 people in the Accommodation and Food Services who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in City of Launceston, compared with 1,839 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).

Analysis of the method of travel to work of the Accommodation and Food Services in the City of Launceston in 2016 compared to Tasmania shows that 4.3% used public transport, while 65.8% used a private vehicle, compared with 5.4% and 59.6% respectively in Tasmania.

The major differences between the method of travel to work of the Accommodation and Food Services workforce in the City of Launceston and Tasmania were:

  • A larger percentage of local workers who travelled by car (as driver) (52.2% compared to 48.6%)
  • A larger percentage of local workers who travelled by car (as a passenger) (13.6% compared to 10.8%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who walked only (7.6% compared to 9.6%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who worked at home (1.3% compared to 3.3%)

Emerging groups

The largest changes in the method of travel of work of the Accommodation and Food Services workforce in the City of Launceston between 2011 and 2016 were:

  • Car, as driver (+202 local workers)
  • Did not go to work (-72 local workers)
  • Walked only (-23 local workers)
  • Bus (-15 local workers)

v19.09.08-1.0.0