City of Launceston

economic profile

launceston logo

City of Launceston

Local workers - Method of travel to work - Professional, Scientific and Technical Services

Within the City of Launceston, there is a similar proportion of local Professional, Scientific and Technical Services workers using public transport to get to work than the Education and Training workforce.

This data reveals the main modes of transport used by local workers in a particular industry to get to work. Workforce transport data for the City of Launceston is very useful in transport planning as it informs decision-makers about the effectiveness and availability of public transport.

There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:

  • The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work (For instance, industries located near railway stations are likely to have higher public transport use than those located away from main public transport routes);
  • The number of motor vehicles available from within a household; and
  • The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.

Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with Workers place of residence and resident place of work for a clearer picture of where people come from to work in the City of Launceston, and Employment locations for the Destination Zones they work in and how they arrive there.

Data source

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2011 (experimental imputed) & 2016 – by place of work

Please note: The 2016 Census used a new methodology to “impute” a work location to people who didn’t state their workplace address. As a result, 2016 and 2011 place of work data are not normally comparable. To allow comparison between 2011 and 2016, .id has sourced a 2011 dataset from the ABS which was experimentally imputed using the same methodology. To provide this detail, the City of Launceston in 2011 had to be constructed from a best fit of Work Destination Zones (DZNs). While it may not be an exact match to the LGA or region boundary, it is considered close enough to allow some comparison. Users should treat this time series data with caution, however, and not compare directly with 2011 data from any other source.
Current industry:
Current benchmark:
reset
reset
export
  • Excel
  • Word
Local workers method of travel to work
City of Launceston - Professional, Scientific and Technical Services 20162011Change
Main method of travelNumber%. Education and Training%Number%. Education and Training%2011 - 2016
Car, as driver1,16665.877.01,06064.476.8+106
Car, as passenger995.63.51247.54.2-25
Train000.1000--
Bus231.31.0221.31.2+1
Ferry000000--
Tram000000--
Truck000000--
Motorbike/Motor scooter181.00.390.50.5+9
Bicycle211.21.4140.90.9+7
Taxi/Other60.30.330.20.2+3
Other - multiple methods261.50.7231.40.7+3
Walked only1066.04.21146.93.6-8
Worked at home1619.12.21478.91.8+14
Did not go to work1418.08.91227.49.5+19
Not stated60.30.380.50.7-2
Total 1,773100.0100.01,646100.0100.0+127

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2011 and 2016. Compiled and presented by .id the population experts

Please refer to specific data notes for more information
Did you know? By clicking/tapping on a category in the chart below you will be able to drilldown to the sub categories.
loading animation
loading animation

Dominant groups

In 2016, there were 23 people in Professional, Scientific and Technical Services who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in the City of Launceston, compared with 1,283 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).

Analysis of the method of travel to work of the Professional, Scientific and Technical Services workforce in the City of Launceston in 2016 compared to the Education and Training workforce within the City of Launceston shows that 1.3% used public transport, while 72.4% used a private vehicle, compared with 1.1% and 80.9% respectively in the Education and Training workforce within the City of Launceston.

The major differences between the method of travel to work of the Professional, Scientific and Technical Services workforce in the City of Launceston and the Education and Training workforce were:

  • A smaller percentage of local workers who travelled by car, as driver (65.8% compared to 77.0%)
  • A larger percentage of local workers who worked at home (9.1% compared to 2.2%)
  • A larger percentage of local workers who travelled by car, as passenger (5.6% compared to 3.5%)
  • A larger percentage of local workers who walked only (6.0% compared to 4.2%)

Emerging groups

The largest changes in the method of travel to work of the Professional, Scientific and Technical Services workforce in the City of Launceston between 2011 and 2016 were:

  • Car, as driver (+106 local workers)
  • Car, as passenger (-25 local workers)
  • Did not go to work (+19 local workers)
  • Worked at home (+14 local workers)

City of Launceston

economic profile