City of Melville

Local workers - Method of travel to work - All industries

Within the City of Melville, there is a lower proportion of local All industries workers using public transport to get to work than the Western Australia workforce.

This data reveals the main modes of transport used by local workers in a particular industry to get to work. Workforce transport data for the City of Melville is very useful in transport planning as it informs decision-makers about the effectiveness and availability of public transport.

There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:

  • The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work (For instance, industries located near railway stations are likely to have higher public transport use than those located away from main public transport routes);
  • The number of motor vehicles available from within a household; and
  • The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.

Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with Workers place of residence and resident place of work for a clearer picture of where people come from to work in the City of Melville, and Employment locations for the Destination Zones they work in and how they arrive there.

Data source

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2011 (experimental imputed) & 2016 – by place of work

Please note: The 2016 Census used a new methodology to “impute” a work location to people who didn’t state their workplace address. As a result, 2016 and 2011 place of work data are not normally comparable. To allow comparison between 2011 and 2016, .id has sourced a 2011 dataset from the ABS which was experimentally imputed using the same methodology. To provide this detail, the City of Melville in 2011 had to be constructed from a best fit of Work Destination Zones (DZNs). While it may not be an exact match to the LGA or region boundary, it is considered close enough to allow some comparison. Users should treat this time series data with caution, however, and not compare directly with 2011 data from any other source.
Current industry:
Current benchmark:
Local workers method of travel to work
City of Melville - All industries 20162011Change
Main method of travelNumber%. Western Australia%Number%. Western Australia%2011 - 2016
Car, as driver27,03367.562.922,32065.760.1+4,713
Car, as passenger1,6744.24.91,6364.85.8+38
Motorbike/Motor scooter1120.30.51240.40.6-12
Other - multiple methods3610.92.13551.02.1+6
Walked only6281.62.86682.03.3-40
Worked at home2,2885.74.22,0486.04.0+240
Did not go to work4,55811.410.24,16712.311.1+391
Not stated3410.91.14701.41.4-129
Total 40,078100.0100.033,968100.0100.0+6,110

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2011 and 2016. Compiled and presented by .id (informed decisions)

Please refer to specific data notes for more information
Did you know? By clicking/tapping on a category in the chart below you will be able to drilldown to the sub categories.
loading animation
loading animation

Dominant groups

In 2016, there were 2,593 people who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in the City of Melville, compared with 28,932 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).

Analysis of the method of travel to work in the City of Melville in 2016 compared to the Western Australia workforce within the City of Melville shows that 6.5% used public transport, while 72.2% used a private vehicle, compared with 9.4% and 69.0% respectively in Western Australia.

The major differences between the method of travel to work of the workforce in the City of Melville and the Western Australia workforce were:

  • A larger percentage of local workers who travelled by car, as driver (67.5% compared to 62.9%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who travelled by bus (2.5% compared to 4.5%)
  • A larger percentage of local workers who worked at home (5.7% compared to 4.2%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who walked only (1.6% compared to 2.8%)

Emerging groups

The largest changes in the method of travel to work of the workforce in the City of Melville between 2011 and 2016 were:

  • Car, as driver (+4,713 local workers)
  • Train (+710 local workers)
  • Did not go to work (+391 local workers)
  • Worked at home (+240 local workers)

City of Melville

economic profile