Northern Tasmania Region

economic profile

northern-tasmania logo

City of Launceston

Resident workers - Method of travel to work - Accommodation and Food Services

Within the City of Launceston, there is a lower proportion of resident Accommodation and Food Services workers using public transport to get to work than the Tasmania workforce.

Maximising access to employment is a key objective in any economic development strategy. Understanding the modes of transport the City of Launceston's local resident workers use (either within or outside the local area), informs decision-makers about the effectiveness of transport modes, routes and availability of local public transport.

There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:

  • The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work;
  • The number of motor vehicles available within a household; and
  • The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.

Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with resident place of work for a clearer picture of where working residents are employed.

Data source

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2011 (experimental imputed) & 2016 – by place of work

Current area:
Select industry:
Current benchmark:
reset
reset
export
  • Excel
  • Word
Resident workers method of travel to work
City of Launceston 20162011Change
Main method of travelNumber%. Tasmania%Number%. Tasmania%2011 - 2016
Car, as driver1,18150.548.51,06244.947.1+119
Car, as passenger29212.510.830512.910.5-13
Train000.130.10.0-3
Bus944.05.41004.25.0-6
Ferry000000.0--
Tram000.0000--
Truck000.1000.1--
Motorbike/Motor scooter271.20.9120.50.4+15
Bicycle160.70.7170.70.6-1
Taxi/Other241.00.5180.80.4+6
Other - multiple methods291.21.2341.41.2-5
Walked only2199.49.724810.59.9-29
Worked at home401.73.3492.13.5-9
Did not go to work41117.618.348820.619.9-77
Not stated70.30.7281.21.5-21
Total 2,340100.0100.02,364100.0100.0-24

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2011 and 2016. Compiled and presented by .id the population experts

Please refer to specific data notes for more information
loading animation
loading animation

Dominant groups

In 2016, there were 94 resident workers in Accommodation and Food Services who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in the City of Launceston, compared with 1,500 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).

Analysis of the method of travel to work of the resident workers in the City of Launceston shows that 4.0% used public transport, while 64.1% used a private vehicle, compared with 5.5% and 60.3% respectively in Tasmania.

The major differences between the method of travel to work of the Accommodation and Food Services resident workers in the City of Launceston and the Tasmania workforce were:

  • A larger percentage of resident workers who travelled by car, as driver (50.5% compared to 48.5%)
  • A larger percentage of resident workers who travelled by car, as passenger (12.5% compared to 10.8%)
  • A smaller percentage of resident workers who worked at home (1.7% compared to 3.3%)
  • A smaller percentage of resident workers who travelled by bus (4.0% compared to 5.4%)

Emerging groups

The largest changes in the method of travel to work of the Accommodation and Food Services resident workers in the City of Launceston between 2011 and 2016 were:

  • Car, as driver (+119 resident workers)
  • Did not go to work (-77 resident workers)
  • Walked only (-29 resident workers)
  • Motorbike/Motor scooter (+15 resident workers)

To continue building your economic story go to...

Northern Tasmania Region

economic profile