City of Launceston
Resident workers - Method of travel to work
The resident workers in City of Launceston have a lower proportion of people using public transport to get to work than Tasmania.
Maximising access to employment is a key objective in any economic development strategy. Understanding the modes of transport City of Launceston's local resident workers use (either within or outside the local area), informs decision-makers about the effectiveness of transport modes, routes and availability of local public transport.
There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:
- The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work;
- The number of motor vehicles available within a household; and
- The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.
Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with Residents place of work and for a clearer picture of where working residents are employed.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2011 and 2016 – by place of work
|Resident workers method of travel to work|
|City of Launceston||2016||2011||Change|
|Main method of travel||Number||%||Tasmania %||Number||%||Tasmania %||2011 to 2016|
|Car, as driver||1,181||50.5||48.5||1,062||44.9||47.1||+119||2001|
|Car, as passenger||292||12.5||10.8||305||12.9||10.5||-13||2002|
|Other - multiple methods||29||1.2||1.2||34||1.4||1.2||-5||2017|
|Worked at home||40||1.7||3.3||49||2.1||3.5||-9||2019|
|Did not go to work||411||17.6||18.3||488||20.6||19.9||-77||2020|
The Northern Tasmania region includes the following 8 LGAs; Break O'Day (M), Dorset (M), Flinders (M), George Town (M), Launceston (C), Meander Valley (M), Northern Midlands (M) & West Tamar (M).
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing (opens a new window) 2011 and 2016. Compiled and presented by .id (opens a new window), the population experts.
In 2016, there were 94 resident workers who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in City of Launceston, compared with 1,473 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).
Analysis of the method of travel to work of the resident workers in City of Launceston shows that 4.0% used public transport, while 62.9% used a private vehicle, compared with 5.4% and 59.4% respectively in Tasmania.
The major differences between the method of travel to work of the resident workers (Accommodation and Food Services) of City of Launceston and Tasmania were:
- A larger percentage of resident workers (Accommodation and Food Services) travelled to work by Car, as driver (50.5% compared to 48.5%)
- A larger percentage of resident workers (Accommodation and Food Services) travelled to work by Car, as passenger (12.5% compared to 10.8%)
- A smaller percentage of resident workers (Accommodation and Food Services) travelled to work by Worked at home (1.7% compared to 3.3%)
- A smaller percentage of resident workers (Accommodation and Food Services) travelled to work by Bus (4.0% compared to 5.4%)
The largest changes in the method of travel of work of the resident workers (Accommodation and Food Services) in City of Launceston between 2011 and 2016 were:
- Car, as driver (+119 people)
- Did not go to work (-77 people)
- Walked only (-29 people)
- Motorbike/Motor scooter (+15 people)