City of Launceston
Local workers - Method of travel to work - Accommodation and Food Services
This data reveals the main modes of transport used by local workers in a particular industry to get to work. Workforce transport data for the City of Launceston is very useful in transport planning as it informs decision-makers about the effectiveness and availability of public transport.
There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:
- The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work (For instance, industries located near railway stations are likely to have higher public transport use than those located away from main public transport routes);
- The number of motor vehicles available from within a household; and
- The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.
Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with Workers place of residence and resident place of work for a clearer picture of where people come from to work in the City of Launceston, and Employment locations for the Destination Zones they work in and how they arrive there.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2011 (experimental imputed) & 2016 – by place of work
|Local workers method of travel to work|
|City of Launceston - Accommodation and Food Services||2016||2011||Change|
|Main method of travel||Number||%||Tasmania%||Number||%||Tasmania%||2011 - 2016|
|Car, as driver||1,458||52.2||48.6||1,256||46.2||47.1||+202|
|Car, as passenger||381||13.6||10.8||381||14.0||10.6||--|
|Other - multiple methods||36||1.3||1.2||32||1.2||1.2||+4|
|Worked at home||36||1.3||3.3||51||1.9||3.6||-15|
|Did not go to work||474||17.0||18.3||546||20.1||19.8||-72|
Please refer to specific data notes for more information
In 2016, there were 119 people in Accommodation and Food Services who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in the City of Launceston, compared with 1,867 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).
Analysis of the method of travel to work of the Accommodation and Food Services workforce in the City of Launceston in 2016 compared to the Tasmania workforce within the City of Launceston shows that 4.3% used public transport, while 66.8% used a private vehicle, compared with 5.4% and 60.5% respectively in Tasmania.
The major differences between the method of travel to work of the Accommodation and Food Services workforce in the City of Launceston and the Tasmania workforce were:
- A larger percentage of local workers who travelled by car, as driver (52.2% compared to 48.6%)
- A larger percentage of local workers who travelled by car, as passenger (13.6% compared to 10.8%)
- A smaller percentage of local workers who walked only (7.6% compared to 9.6%)
- A smaller percentage of local workers who worked at home (1.3% compared to 3.3%)
The largest changes in the method of travel to work of the Accommodation and Food Services workforce in the City of Launceston between 2011 and 2016 were:
- Car, as driver (+202 local workers)
- Did not go to work (-72 local workers)
- Walked only (-23 local workers)
- Worked at home (-15 local workers)