Northern Tasmania RegionEconomic profile
Skip to content

Flinders Council

Local workers - Method of travel to work - All industries

Within Flinders Council, there is a lower proportion of local workers using public transport to get to work than Tasmania.

This data reveals the main modes of transport used by local workers in a particular industry to get to work. Workforce transport data for Flinders Council is very useful in transport planning as it informs decision-makers about the effectiveness and availability of public transport.

There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:

  • The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work (For instance, industries located near railway stations are likely to have higher public transport use than those located away from main public transport routes);
  • The number of motor vehicles available from within a household; and
  • The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.

Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with Workers pace of residence and Residents Place of work for a clearer picture of where people come from to work in the Flinders Council, and Employment locations for the Destination Zones they work in and how they arrive there.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2011 (experimental imputed) & 2016 – by place of work

Please note – The 2016 Census used a new methodology to “impute” a work location to people who didn’t state their workplace address. As a result, 2016 and 2011 place of work data are not normally comparable. To allow comparison between 2011 and 2016, .id has sourced a 2011 dataset from the ABS which was experimentally imputed using the same methodology. To provide this detail, Flinders Council in 2011 had to be constructed from a best fit of Work Destination Zones (DZNs). While it may not be an exact match to the LGA or region boundary, it is considered close enough to allow some comparison. Users should treat this time series data with caution, however, and not compare directly with 2011 data from any other source.

Local workers method of travel to work
Flinders Council - All industries20162011Change
Main method of travelNumber%Tasmania %Number%Tasmania %2011 to 2016
Car, as driver23357.265.520952.163.4+24
Car, as passenger225.45.8174.26.8+5
Train00.00.100.00.00
Bus00.02.841.03.0-4
Ferry00.00.000.00.00
Tram00.00.000.00.00
Truck30.70.841.00.9-1
Motorbike/Motor scooter00.00.630.70.5-3
Bicycle30.70.800.00.6+3
Taxi/Other30.70.300.00.3+3
Other - multiple methods82.01.3123.01.3-4
Walked only399.64.86015.05.0-21
Worked at home5613.84.75012.54.5+6
Did not go to work358.611.6338.212.3+2
Not stated51.21.092.21.4-4

The Northern Tasmania region includes the following 8 LGAs; Break O'Day (M), Dorset (M), Flinders (M), George Town (M), Launceston (C), Meander Valley (M), Northern Midlands (M) & West Tamar (M).

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2011 and 2016. Compiled and presented by .id , the population experts.

Local workers method of travel to work, 2016
Local workers method of travel to work, 2016 Car, as driver, Tasmania: 65.5% Car, as passenger, Tasmania: 5.8% Train, Tasmania: 0.1% Bus, Tasmania: 2.8% Ferry, Tasmania: 0.0% Tram, Tasmania: 0.0% Truck, Tasmania: 0.8% Motorbike/Motor scooter, Tasmania: 0.6% Bicycle, Tasmania: 0.8% Taxi/Other, Tasmania: 0.3% Other - multiple methods, Tasmania: 1.3% Worked at home, Tasmania: 4.7% Did not go to work, Tasmania: 11.6% Not stated, Tasmania: 1.0% Car, as driver, Flinders Council: 57.2% Car, as passenger, Flinders Council: 5.4% Train, Flinders Council: 0.0% Bus, Flinders Council: 0.0% Ferry, Flinders Council: 0.0% Tram, Flinders Council: 0.0% Truck, Flinders Council: 0.7% Motorbike/Motor scooter, Flinders Council: 0.0% Bicycle, Flinders Council: 0.7% Taxi/Other, Flinders Council: 0.7% Other - multiple methods, Flinders Council: 2.0% Worked at home, Flinders Council: 13.8% Did not go to work, Flinders Council: 8.6% Not stated, Flinders Council: 1.2%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2016
Compiled and presented in economy.id by .id, the population experts.
Change in local workers method of travel to work, 2011 to 2016
Change in local workers method of travel to work, 2011 to 2016 Car, as driver, Flinders Council: +24 Car, as passenger, Flinders Council: +5 Train, Flinders Council: 0 Bus, Flinders Council: -4 Ferry, Flinders Council: 0 Tram, Flinders Council: 0 Truck, Flinders Council: -1 Motorbike/Motor scooter, Flinders Council: -3 Bicycle, Flinders Council: +3 Taxi/Other, Flinders Council: +3 Other - multiple methods, Flinders Council: -4 Worked at home, Flinders Council: +6 Did not go to work, Flinders Council: +2 Not stated, Flinders Council: -4
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2011 and 2016
Compiled and presented in economy.id by .id, the population experts.

Dominant groups

In 2016, there were 0 people in the who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in Flinders Council, compared with 258 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).

Analysis of the method of travel to work of the in Flinders Council in 2016 compared to Tasmania shows that 0.0% used public transport, while 63.4% used a private vehicle, compared with 2.9% and 72.1% respectively in Tasmania.

The major differences between the method of travel to work of the workforce in Flinders Council and Tasmania were:

  • A larger percentage of local workers who worked at home (13.8% compared to 4.7%)
  • A larger percentage of local workers who walked only (9.6% compared to 4.8%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who travelled by car (as driver) (57.2% compared to 65.5%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who did not go to work (8.6% compared to 11.6%)

Emerging groups

The largest changes in the method of travel of work of the workforce in Flinders Council between 2011 and 2016 were:

  • Car, as driver (+24 local workers)
  • Walked only (-21 local workers)
  • Worked at home (+6 local workers)
  • Car, as passenger (+5 local workers)

v19.07.26-1.0.1