RDA Limestone Coast RegionEconomic profile
Skip to content

District Council of Grant

Local workers - Field of qualification - All industries

Within District Council of Grant, there are more with Engineering and Related Technologies qualifications than any other field of qualification.

Field of Qualification presents the primary field of study for the highest qualification the person has received. While this is likely to have some relationship to the current occupation, this is not necessarily the case.

The field of study relates to a number of factors, such as:

  • The age of the workforce;
  • The type of qualification required to enter an industry;
  • The availability of jobs related to fields of qualification in Limestone Coast region;
  • The types of occupations which are available in an area or industry.

The fields of qualification held by local workers in a particular industry are likely to show the type of skills required in that industry.  Large numbers of a particular field of qualification in an industry may indicate that it is a pre-requisite for that industry. The presence of fields of qualification outside the main range of qualifications used in that industry may indicate that the industry values employees of a broad educational background, or that people haven't been able to find employment in their chosen field.

Field of Qualification information should be looked at in conjunction with Level of qualification and Occupation data for a clearer picture of the skills available for the local workers in Limestone Coast region.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2016 – by place of work

Please note – The 2016 Census used a new methodology to “impute” a work location to people who didn’t state their workplace address. As a result, 2016 and 2011 place of work data are not normally comparable. To allow comparison between 2011 and 2016, .id has sourced a 2011 dataset from the ABS which was experimentally imputed using the same methodology. However this dataset is NOT available at the Local Government Area level, and had to be matched using a best fit of work destination zones (DZNs) to the current LGA boundaries. District Council of Grant is one area for which there is no good match of 2011 DZNs to 2016 LGA boundaries, so there is no reasonable data comparison between 2011 and 2016 for this area. 2011 data has been turned off and is currently unavailable for comparison for District Council of Grant.

Did you know? By clicking/tapping on a data row in the table you will be able to see sub categories.
Local workers field of qualification - Summary
District Council of Grant - All industries2016
Field of qualification
(Click rows to view sub-categories)
Number%South Australia %
Natural and Physical Sciences190.82.0
Information Technology120.51.8
Engineering and Related Technologies33014.610.8
Architecture and Building773.43.6
Agriculture, Environmental and Related Studies1556.81.9
Health582.68.6
Education1185.25.4
Management and Commerce1396.112.9
Society and Culture904.08.9
Creative Arts160.72.0
Food, Hospitality and Personal Services723.23.6
Mixed Field Programmes00.00.1
Not stated or inadequately described823.62.5
No qualification1,09648.435.8

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2016. Compiled and presented by .id , the population experts.

Local workers field of qualification, 2016
Local workers field of qualification, 2016 Natural and Physical Sciences, South Australia: 2.0% Information Technology, South Australia: 1.8% Engineering and Related Technologies, South Australia: 10.8% Architecture and Building, South Australia: 3.6% Agriculture, Environmental and Related Studies, South Australia: 1.9% Health, South Australia: 8.6% Education, South Australia: 5.4% Management and Commerce, South Australia: 12.9% Society and Culture, South Australia: 8.9% Creative Arts, South Australia: 2.0% Food, Hospitality and Personal Services, South Australia: 3.6% Mixed Field Programmes, South Australia: 0.1% Not stated or inadequately described, South Australia: 2.5% No qualification, South Australia: 35.8% Natural and Physical Sciences, District Council of Grant: 0.8% Information Technology, District Council of Grant: 0.5% Engineering and Related Technologies, District Council of Grant: 14.6% Architecture and Building, District Council of Grant: 3.4% Agriculture, Environmental and Related Studies, District Council of Grant: 6.8% Health, District Council of Grant: 2.6% Education, District Council of Grant: 5.2% Management and Commerce, District Council of Grant: 6.1% Society and Culture, District Council of Grant: 4.0% Creative Arts, District Council of Grant: 0.7% Food, Hospitality and Personal Services, District Council of Grant: 3.2% Mixed Field Programmes, District Council of Grant: 0.0% Not stated or inadequately described, District Council of Grant: 3.6% No qualification, District Council of Grant: 48.4%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2016
Compiled and presented in economy.id by .id, the population experts.

Dominant groups

Analysis of the fields of qualifications of the shows that the three largest fields of qualification were:

  • Engineering and Related Technologies (330 people or 14.6%)
  • Agriculture, Environmental and Related Studies (155 people or 6.8%)
  • Management and Commerce (139 people or 6.1%)

In combination these three fields accounted for 624 people in total or 27.5% of the .

In comparison, South Australia employed 10.8% in Engineering and Related Technologies; 1.9% in Agriculture, Environmental and Related Studies; and 12.9% in Management and Commerce.

The major differences between the fields of qualifications of the workforce in District Council of Grant and South Australia were:

  • A larger percentage of local workers qualified in the field of Agriculture, Environmental and Related Studies (6.8% compared to 1.9%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers qualified in the field of Management and Commerce (6.1% compared to 12.9%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers qualified in the field of Health (2.6% compared to 8.6%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers qualified in the field of Society and Culture (4.0% compared to 8.9%)

To continue building your economic story go to...

v19.10.16-1.0.0