District Council of Grant
Local workers - Method of travel to work - All industries
Within District Council of Grant, there is a lower proportion of local workers using public transport to get to work than Australia.
This data reveals the main modes of transport used by local workers in a particular industry to get to work. Workforce transport data for District Council of Grant is very useful in transport planning as it informs decision-makers about the effectiveness and availability of public transport.
There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:
- The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work (For instance, industries located near railway stations are likely to have higher public transport use than those located away from main public transport routes);
- The number of motor vehicles available from within a household; and
- The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.
Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with Workers pace of residence and Residents Place of work for a clearer picture of where people come from to work in the District Council of Grant, and Employment locations for the Destination Zones they work in and how they arrive there.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2016 – by place of work
Please note – The 2016 Census used a new methodology to “impute” a work location to people who didn’t state their workplace address. As a result, 2016 and 2011 place of work data are not normally comparable. To allow comparison between 2011 and 2016, .id has sourced a 2011 dataset from the ABS which was experimentally imputed using the same methodology. However this dataset is NOT available at the Local Government Area level, and had to be matched using a best fit of work destination zones (DZNs) to the current LGA boundaries. District Council of Grant is one area for which there is no good match of 2011 DZNs to 2016 LGA boundaries, so there is no reasonable data comparison between 2011 and 2016 for this area. 2011 data has been turned off and is currently unavailable for comparison for District Council of Grant.
|Local workers method of travel to work|
|District Council of Grant - All industries||2016|
|Main method of travel||Number||%||Australia %|
|Car, as driver||1,392||61.1||61.5||2001|
|Car, as passenger||71||3.1||4.6||2002|
|Other - multiple methods||43||1.9||1.4||2017|
|Worked at home||351||15.4||4.7||2019|
|Did not go to work||213||9.4||9.4||2020|
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing (opens a new window) 2016. Compiled and presented by .id (opens a new window), the population experts.
In 2016, there were 8 people in the who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in District Council of Grant, compared with 1,504 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).
Analysis of the method of travel to work of the in District Council of Grant in 2016 compared to Australia shows that 0.4% used public transport, while 66.1% used a private vehicle, compared with 10.8% and 67.5% respectively in Australia.
The major differences between the method of travel to work of the workforce in District Council of Grant and Australia were:
- A larger percentage of local workers Worked at home (15.4% compared to 4.7%)
- A smaller percentage of local workers Train (0.0% compared to 7.2%)
- A smaller percentage of local workers Bus (0.4% compared to 3.5%)
- A smaller percentage of local workers Car, as passenger (3.1% compared to 4.6%)