Scenic Rim Regional Council
Resident workers - Method of travel to work - All industries
Maximising access to employment is a key objective in any economic development strategy. Understanding the modes of transport the Scenic Rim Regional Council's local resident workers use (either within or outside the local area), informs decision-makers about the effectiveness of transport modes, routes and availability of local public transport.
There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:
- The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work;
- The number of motor vehicles available within a household; and
- The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.
Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with resident place of work for a clearer picture of where working residents are employed.
Data source
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2016 & 2021 – by place of work
Select industry:
Current benchmark:
| Resident workers method of travel to work | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scenic Rim Regional Council | 2021 | 2016 | Change | ||||||
| Main method of travel | Number | % | Queensland% | Number | % | Queensland% | 2016 - 2021 | ||
| Car, as driver | 11,580 | 61.6 | 60.0 | 11,029 | 65.1 | 64.1 | +551 | ||
| Car, as passenger | 707 | 3.8 | 4.5 | 748 | 4.4 | 5.3 | -41 | ||
| Train | 60 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 123 | 0.7 | 3.2 | -63 | ||
| Bus | 61 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 88 | 0.5 | 3.6 | -27 | ||
| Ferry | 4 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | +1 | ||
| Tram | 16 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | +16 | ||
| Truck | 318 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 338 | 2.0 | 0.9 | -20 | ||
| Motorbike/Motor scooter | 91 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 114 | 0.7 | 0.9 | -23 | ||
| Bicycle | 37 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 38 | 0.2 | 1.0 | -1 | ||
| Taxi/Other | 10 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 7 | 0.0 | 0.2 | +3 | ||
| Other - multiple methods | 122 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 231 | 1.4 | 1.5 | -109 | ||
| Walked only | 549 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 584 | 3.4 | 3.3 | -35 | ||
| Worked at home | 2,929 | 15.6 | 14.1 | 1,597 | 9.4 | 5.3 | +1,332 | ||
| Did not go to work | 2,106 | 11.2 | 11.1 | 1,821 | 10.8 | 9.7 | +285 | ||
| Not stated | 195 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 208 | 1.2 | 0.9 | -13 | ||
| Total | 18,785 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 16,929 | 100.0 | 100.0 | +1,856 | ||
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2016 and 2021. Compiled and presented by .id (informed decisions) Please refer to specific data notes for more information | |||||||||
Dominant groups
In 2021, there were 137 resident workers who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in the Scenic Rim Regional Council, compared with 12,696 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).
Analysis of the method of travel to work of the resident workers in the Scenic Rim Regional Council shows that 0.7% used public transport, while 67.6% used a private vehicle, compared with 3.9% and 66.0% respectively in Queensland.
The major differences between the method of travel to work of the resident workers in the Scenic Rim Regional Council and the Queensland workforce were:
- A smaller percentage of resident workers who travelled by bus (0.3% compared to 2.0%)
- A larger percentage of resident workers who travelled by car, as driver (61.6% compared to 60.0%)
- A larger percentage of resident workers who worked at home (15.6% compared to 14.1%)
- A smaller percentage of resident workers who travelled by train (0.3% compared to 1.8%)
Emerging groups
The largest changes in the method of travel to work of the resident workers in the Scenic Rim Regional Council between 2016 and 2021 were:
- Worked at home (+1,332 resident workers)
- Car, as driver (+551 resident workers)
- Did not go to work (+285 resident workers)
- Other - multiple methods (-109 resident workers)