City of Tea Tree GullyEconomic profile
Skip to content

City of Tea Tree Gully

Local workers - Occupations - All industries

Within the City of Tea Tree Gully, the workforce has a similar proportion of Managers and Professionals compared to South Australia.

Occupation is a key component for evaluating the socio-economic status of the local workers and the skills required to work in each industry sector.

The occupations of the local worers in City of Tea Tree Gully will be influenced by factors including:

  • The economic base and employment opportunities available in City of Tea Tree Gully;
  • The age of the workforce;
  • The skill and qualification level required to enter an industry; and
  • The working and social aspirations of the population.

For a complete local workers analysis for City of Tea Tree Gully, view Occupations in conjunction with other indicators, such as Educational qualifications and Income.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2016 – by place of work

Please note: Currently only 2016 data are available for work destination. 2011 data are not comparable due to a change in methodology in 2016 which “imputed” a work destination to those workers who didn’t state their work destination. This means comparisons with earlier years should not be made. .id are currently sourcing data collected under the same methodology in 2011 which will be added to this page at a later date. For a detailed case study of this issue please visit our blog post.

Did you know? By clicking/tapping on a data row in the table you will be able to see sub categories.
Local workers occupations
City of Tea Tree Gully - All industries2016
Occupations
(Click rows to view sub-categories)
Number%South Australia %
Managers1,9349.112.6
Professionals3,88218.220.2
Technicians and Trades Workers2,79713.113.4
Community and Personal Service Workers3,31315.612.0
Clerical and Administrative Workers2,22410.513.4
Sales Workers3,56716.89.6
Machinery Operators And Drivers9934.76.1
Labourers2,29910.811.1
Inadequately described or not stated2631.21.5

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2011 and 2016. Compiled and presented by .id , the population experts.

Local workers occupations, 2016
Local workers occupations, 2016 Managers, South Australia: 12.6% Professionals, South Australia: 20.2% Technicians and Trades Workers, South Australia: 13.4% Community and Personal Service Workers, South Australia: 12.0% Clerical and Administrative Workers, South Australia: 13.4% Sales Workers, South Australia: 9.6% Machinery Operators And Drivers, South Australia: 6.1% Labourers, South Australia: 11.1% Inadequately described or not stated, South Australia: 1.5% Managers, City of Tea Tree Gully: 9.1% Professionals, City of Tea Tree Gully: 18.2% Technicians and Trades Workers, City of Tea Tree Gully: 13.1% Community and Personal Service Workers, City of Tea Tree Gully: 15.6% Clerical and Administrative Workers, City of Tea Tree Gully: 10.5% Sales Workers, City of Tea Tree Gully: 16.8% Machinery Operators And Drivers, City of Tea Tree Gully: 4.7% Labourers, City of Tea Tree Gully: 10.8% Inadequately described or not stated, City of Tea Tree Gully: 1.2%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2016
Compiled and presented in economy.id by .id, the population experts.

Dominant groups

An analysis of the jobs held by the in City of Tea Tree Gully in 2016 shows the three most popular occupations were:

  • Professionals (3,882 local workers or 18.2%)
  • Sales Workers (3,567 local workers or 16.8%)
  • Community and Personal Service Workers (3,313 local workers or 15.6%)

In combination these three occupations accounted for 10,762 people in total or 50.6% of the local workers .

In comparison, South Australia employed 20.2% as Professionals; 9.6% as Sales Workers; and 12.0% as Community and Personal Service Workers.

The major differences between the jobs held by the in the City of Tea Tree Gully and South Australia were:

  • A larger percentage of local workers employed as Sales Workers (16.8% compared to 9.6%)
  • A larger percentage of local workers employed as Community and Personal Service Workers (15.6% compared to 12.0%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers employed as Managers (9.1% compared to 12.6%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers employed as Clerical and Administrative Workers (10.5% compared to 13.4%)

To continue building your economic story go to...

v18.02.07-1.0.0