Redland City CouncilEconomic profile
Skip to content

Redland City

Local workers - Method of travel to work - All industries

Within Redland City, the have a lower proportion of people using public transport to get to work than Queensland.

This data reveals the main modes of transport used by local workers in a particular industry to get to work. Workforce transport data for Redland City is very useful in transport planning as it informs decision-makers about the effectiveness and availability of public transport.

There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:

  • The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work (For instance, industries located near railway stations are likely to have higher public transport use than those located away from main public transport routes);
  • The number of motor vehicles available from within a household; and
  • The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.

Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with Workers pace of residence and Residents Place of work for a clearer picture of where people come from to work in the Redland City, and Employment locations for the Destination Zones they work in and how they arrive there.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2016 – by place of work

Please note: Currently only 2016 data are available for work destination. 2011 data are not comparable due to a change in methodology in 2016 which “imputed” a work destination to those workers who didn’t state their work destination. This means comparisons with earlier years should not be made. .id are currently sourcing data collected under the same methodology in 2011 which will be added to this page at a later date. For a detailed case study of this issue please visit our blog post.

Local workers method of travel to work
Redland City - All industries2016
Main method of travelNumber%Queensland %
Car, as driver27,23467.164.3
Car, as passenger2,2055.45.3
Motorbike/Motor scooter1990.50.9
Other - multiple methods7821.91.5
Walked only9282.33.3
Worked at home3,1827.85.3
Did not go to work4,27110.59.7
Not stated2780.70.9

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2011 and 2016. Compiled and presented by .id , the population experts.

Local workers method of travel to work, 2016
Local workers method of travel to work, 2016 Car, as driver, Queensland: 64.3% Car, as passenger, Queensland: 5.3% Train, Queensland: 3.2% Bus, Queensland: 3.4% Ferry, Queensland: 0.1% Tram, Queensland: 0.1% Truck, Queensland: 0.9% Motorbike/Motor scooter, Queensland: 0.9% Bicycle, Queensland: 1.0% Taxi/Other, Queensland: 0.2% Other - multiple methods, Queensland: 1.5% Worked at home, Queensland: 5.3% Did not go to work, Queensland: 9.7% Not stated, Queensland: 0.9% Car, as driver, Redland City: 67.1% Car, as passenger, Redland City: 5.4% Train, Redland City: 0.6% Bus, Redland City: 1.3% Ferry, Redland City: 0.2% Tram, Redland City: 0.0% Truck, Redland City: 0.9% Motorbike/Motor scooter, Redland City: 0.5% Bicycle, Redland City: 0.5% Taxi/Other, Redland City: 0.1% Other - multiple methods, Redland City: 1.9% Worked at home, Redland City: 7.8% Did not go to work, Redland City: 10.5% Not stated, Redland City: 0.7%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2016
Compiled and presented in by .id, the population experts.

Dominant groups

In 2016, there were 864 people in the who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in Redland City, compared with 29,824 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).

Analysis of the method of travel to work of the in Redland City in 2016 compared to Queensland shows that 2.1% used public transport, while 73.5% used a private vehicle, compared with 6.8% and 70.6% respectively in Queensland.

The major differences between the method of travel to work of the in Redland City and Queensland were:

  • A larger percentage of local workers who travelled by car (as driver) (67.1% compared to 64.3%)
  • A larger percentage of local workers who worked at home (7.8% compared to 5.3%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who travelled by train (0.6% compared to 3.2%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who travelled by bus (1.3% compared to 3.4%)