Redland City

Local workers - Method of travel to work - All industries

Within Redland City, there is a lower proportion of local All industries workers using public transport to get to work than the Queensland workforce.

This data reveals the main modes of transport used by local workers in a particular industry to get to work. Workforce transport data for Redland City is very useful in transport planning as it informs decision-makers about the effectiveness and availability of public transport.

There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:

  • The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work (For instance, industries located near railway stations are likely to have higher public transport use than those located away from main public transport routes);
  • The number of motor vehicles available from within a household; and
  • The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.

Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with Workers place of residence and resident place of work for a clearer picture of where people come from to work in Redland City, and Employment locations for the Destination Zones they work in and how they arrive there.

Data source

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2011 (experimental imputed) & 2016 – by place of work

Please note: The 2016 Census used a new methodology to “impute” a work location to people who didn’t state their workplace address. As a result, 2016 and 2011 place of work data are not normally comparable. To allow comparison between 2011 and 2016, .id has sourced a 2011 dataset from the ABS which was experimentally imputed using the same methodology. To provide this detail, Redland City in 2011 had to be constructed from a best fit of Work Destination Zones (DZNs). While it may not be an exact match to the LGA or region boundary, it is considered close enough to allow some comparison. Users should treat this time series data with caution, however, and not compare directly with 2011 data from any other source.
Current industry:
Current benchmark:
reset
Local workers method of travel to work
Redland City - All industries 20162011Change
Main method of travelNumber%. Queensland%Number%. Queensland%2011 - 2016
Car, as driver27,23467.164.324,55064.161.3+2,684
Car, as passenger2,2055.45.32,2295.86.1-24
Train2460.63.22720.73.5-26
Bus5441.33.46401.73.8-96
Ferry740.20.1550.10.1+19
Tram30.00.1000.0+3
Truck3820.90.94631.21.3-81
Motorbike/Motor scooter1990.50.92010.50.9-2
Bicycle2020.51.02130.61.1-11
Taxi/Other500.10.2540.10.2-4
Other - multiple methods7821.91.57542.01.4+28
Walked only9282.33.39942.63.7-66
Worked at home3,1827.85.32,8577.54.9+325
Did not go to work4,27110.59.74,48311.710.2-212
Not stated2780.70.95321.41.4-254
Total 40,580100.0100.038,297100.0100.0+2,283

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2011 and 2016. Compiled and presented by .id (informed decisions)

Please refer to specific data notes for more information
Did you know? By clicking/tapping on a category in the chart below you will be able to drilldown to the sub categories.
loading animation
loading animation

Dominant groups

In 2016, there were 867 people who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in Redland City, compared with 30,020 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).

Analysis of the method of travel to work in Redland City in 2016 compared to the Queensland workforce within Redland City shows that 2.1% used public transport, while 74.0% used a private vehicle, compared with 6.9% and 71.4% respectively in Queensland.

The major differences between the method of travel to work of the workforce in Redland City and the Queensland workforce were:

  • A larger percentage of local workers who travelled by car, as driver (67.1% compared to 64.3%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who travelled by train (0.6% compared to 3.2%)
  • A larger percentage of local workers who worked at home (7.8% compared to 5.3%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who travelled by bus (1.3% compared to 3.4%)

Emerging groups

The largest changes in the method of travel to work of the workforce in Redland City between 2011 and 2016 were:

  • Car, as driver (+2,684 local workers)
  • Worked at home (+325 local workers)
  • Did not go to work (-212 local workers)
  • Bus (-96 local workers)

Redland City Council

economic profile