RDA Limestone Coast Region

economic profile

rda-limestone-coast logo

Limestone Coast region

Local workers - Method of travel to work - All industries

Within the Limestone Coast region, there is a lower proportion of local All industries workers using public transport to get to work than the South Australia workforce.

This data reveals the main modes of transport used by local workers in a particular industry to get to work. Workforce transport data for the Limestone Coast region is very useful in transport planning as it informs decision-makers about the effectiveness and availability of public transport.

There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:

  • The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work (For instance, industries located near railway stations are likely to have higher public transport use than those located away from main public transport routes);
  • The number of motor vehicles available from within a household; and
  • The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.

Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with Workers place of residence and resident place of work for a clearer picture of where people come from to work in the Limestone Coast region, and Employment locations for the Destination Zones they work in and how they arrive there.

Data source

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2011 (experimental imputed) & 2016 – by place of work

Please note: The 2016 Census used a new methodology to “impute” a work location to people who didn’t state their workplace address. As a result, 2016 and 2011 place of work data are not normally comparable. To allow comparison between 2011 and 2016, .id has sourced a 2011 dataset from the ABS which was experimentally imputed using the same methodology. To provide this detail, the Limestone Coast region in 2011 had to be constructed from a best fit of Work Destination Zones (DZNs). While it may not be an exact match to the LGA or region boundary, it is considered close enough to allow some comparison. Users should treat this time series data with caution, however, and not compare directly with 2011 data from any other source.
Current area:
Current industry:
Current benchmark:
  • Excel
  • Word
Local workers method of travel to work
Limestone Coast region - All industries 20162011Change
Main method of travelNumber%. South Australia%Number%. South Australia%2011 - 2016
Car, as driver19,67869.166.219,01665.563.9+662
Car, as passenger1,3484.74.51,6055.55.3-257
Motorbike/Motor scooter1290.50.51230.40.5+6
Other - multiple methods3861.41.44231.51.4-37
Walked only1,0473.72.71,2164.23.2-169
Worked at home2,0637.24.42,2397.74.2-176
Did not go to work3,00210.510.73,32111.411.4-319
Not stated3821.30.95181.81.4-136
Total 28,497100.0100.029,033100.0100.0-536

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2011 and 2016. Compiled and presented by .id informed decisions

Please refer to specific data notes for more information
Did you know? By clicking/tapping on a category in the chart below you will be able to drilldown to the sub categories.
loading animation
loading animation

Dominant groups

In 2016, there were 50 people who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in the Limestone Coast region, compared with 21,402 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).

Analysis of the method of travel to work in the Limestone Coast region in 2016 compared to the South Australia workforce within the Limestone Coast region shows that 0.2% used public transport, while 75.1% used a private vehicle, compared with 6.9% and 71.8% respectively in South Australia.

The major differences between the method of travel to work of the workforce in the Limestone Coast region and the South Australia workforce were:

  • A smaller percentage of local workers who travelled by bus (0.1% compared to 4.7%)
  • A larger percentage of local workers who travelled by car, as driver (69.1% compared to 66.2%)
  • A larger percentage of local workers who worked at home (7.2% compared to 4.4%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who travelled by train (0.0% compared to 1.9%)

Emerging groups

The largest changes in the method of travel to work of the workforce in the Limestone Coast region between 2011 and 2016 were:

  • Car, as driver (+662 local workers)
  • Did not go to work (-319 local workers)
  • Car, as passenger (-257 local workers)
  • Worked at home (-176 local workers)

RDA Limestone Coast Region

economic profile