Clarence Valley Council area
Local workers - Method of travel to work - All industries
This data reveals the main modes of transport used by local workers in a particular industry to get to work. Workforce transport data for Clarence Valley Council area is very useful in transport planning as it informs decision-makers about the effectiveness and availability of public transport.
There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:
- The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work (For instance, industries located near railway stations are likely to have higher public transport use than those located away from main public transport routes);
- The number of motor vehicles available from within a household; and
- The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.
Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with Workers place of residence and resident place of work for a clearer picture of where people come from to work in Clarence Valley Council area, and Employment locations for the Destination Zones they work in and how they arrive there.
Data source
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2016 & 2021 – by place of work
Current industry:
Current benchmark:
| Local workers method of travel to work | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clarence Valley Council area - All industries | 2021 | 2016 | Change | ||||||
| Main method of travel | Number | % | New South Wales% | Number | % | New South Wales% | 2016 - 2021 | ||
| Car, as driver | 12,083 | 66.0 | 43.2 | 10,939 | 66.9 | 57.7 | +1,144 | ||
| Car, as passenger | 871 | 4.8 | 3.2 | 839 | 5.1 | 4.3 | +32 | ||
| Train | 6 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 8 | 0.0 | 11.3 | -2 | ||
| Bus | 63 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 62 | 0.4 | 4.4 | +1 | ||
| Ferry | 27 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.2 | +24 | ||
| Tram | 5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | +2 | ||
| Truck | 184 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 195 | 1.2 | 1.0 | -11 | ||
| Motorbike/Motor scooter | 70 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 83 | 0.5 | 0.6 | -13 | ||
| Bicycle | 165 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 176 | 1.1 | 0.7 | -11 | ||
| Taxi/Other | 15 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 19 | 0.1 | 0.2 | -4 | ||
| Other - multiple methods | 73 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 212 | 1.3 | 1.2 | -139 | ||
| Walked only | 740 | 4.0 | 2.5 | 760 | 4.6 | 3.9 | -20 | ||
| Worked at home | 1,891 | 10.3 | 31.3 | 1,059 | 6.5 | 4.9 | +832 | ||
| Did not go to work | 1,936 | 10.6 | 13.2 | 1,793 | 11.0 | 8.7 | +143 | ||
| Not stated | 165 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 209 | 1.3 | 1.0 | -44 | ||
| Total | 18,294 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 16,360 | 100.0 | 100.0 | +1,934 | ||
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2016 and 2021. Compiled and presented by .id (informed decisions) Please refer to specific data notes for more information | |||||||||
Dominant groups
In 2021, there were 74 people who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in Clarence Valley Council area, compared with 13,208 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).
Analysis of the method of travel to work in Clarence Valley Council area in 2021 compared to the New South Wales workforce within Clarence Valley Council area shows that 0.4% used public transport, while 72.2% used a private vehicle, compared with 3.9% and 47.5% respectively in New South Wales.
The major differences between the method of travel to work of the workforce in Clarence Valley Council area and the New South Wales workforce were:
- A larger percentage of local workers who travelled by car, as driver (66.0% compared to 43.2%)
- A smaller percentage of local workers who worked at home (10.3% compared to 31.3%)
- A smaller percentage of local workers who travelled by train (0.0% compared to 2.8%)
- A smaller percentage of local workers who did not go to work (10.6% compared to 13.2%)
Emerging groups
The largest changes in the method of travel to work of the workforce in Clarence Valley Council area between2016 and 2021 were:
- Car, as driver (+1,144 local workers)
- Worked at home (+832 local workers)
- Did not go to work (+143 local workers)
- Other - multiple methods (-139 local workers)