Bundaberg Regional CouncilEconomic profile
Skip to content

Bundaberg Regional Council

Local workers - Method of travel to work - All industries

Within the Bundaberg Regional Council, there is a lower proportion of local workers using public transport to get to work than Queensland.

This data reveals the main modes of transport used by local workers in a particular industry to get to work. Workforce transport data for the Bundaberg Regional Council is very useful in transport planning as it informs decision-makers about the effectiveness and availability of public transport.

There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:

  • The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work (For instance, industries located near railway stations are likely to have higher public transport use than those located away from main public transport routes);
  • The number of motor vehicles available from within a household; and
  • The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.

Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with Workers pace of residence and Residents Place of work for a clearer picture of where people come from to work in the the Bundaberg Regional Council, and Employment locations for the Destination Zones they work in and how they arrive there.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2011 (experimental imputed) & 2016 – by place of work

Please note – The 2016 Census used a new methodology to “impute” a work location to people who didn’t state their workplace address. As a result, 2016 and 2011 place of work data are not normally comparable. To allow comparison between 2011 and 2016, .id has sourced a 2011 dataset from the ABS which was experimentally imputed using the same methodology. To provide this detail, Bundaberg Regional Council in 2011 had to be constructed from a best fit of Work Destination Zones (DZNs). While it may not be an exact match to the LGA or region boundary, it is considered close enough to allow some comparison. Users should treat this time series data with caution, however, and not compare directly with 2011 data from any other source.

Local workers method of travel to work
Bundaberg Regional Council - All industries20162011Change
Main method of travelNumber%Queensland %Number%Queensland %2011 to 2016
Car, as driver22,17870.864.320,79166.761.3+1,387
Car, as passenger2,1246.85.32,3397.56.1-215
Train220.13.2180.13.5+4
Bus1570.53.42330.73.8-76
Ferry60.00.170.00.1-1
Tram00.00.100.00.00
Truck2820.90.93931.31.3-111
Motorbike/Motor scooter3281.00.93811.20.9-53
Bicycle2310.71.03441.11.1-113
Taxi/Other410.10.2600.20.2-19
Other - multiple methods3041.01.53631.21.4-59
Walked only8842.83.39733.13.7-89
Worked at home1,6545.35.31,7815.74.9-127
Did not go to work2,7548.89.72,9399.410.2-185
Not stated3691.20.95271.71.4-158

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2011 and 2016. Compiled and presented by .id , the population experts.

Local workers method of travel to work, 2016
Local workers method of travel to work, 2016 Car, as driver, Queensland: 64.3% Car, as passenger, Queensland: 5.3% Train, Queensland: 3.2% Bus, Queensland: 3.4% Ferry, Queensland: 0.1% Tram, Queensland: 0.1% Truck, Queensland: 0.9% Motorbike/Motor scooter, Queensland: 0.9% Bicycle, Queensland: 1.0% Taxi/Other, Queensland: 0.2% Other - multiple methods, Queensland: 1.5% Worked at home, Queensland: 5.3% Did not go to work, Queensland: 9.7% Not stated, Queensland: 0.9% Car, as driver, Bundaberg Regional Council: 70.8% Car, as passenger, Bundaberg Regional Council: 6.8% Train, Bundaberg Regional Council: 0.1% Bus, Bundaberg Regional Council: 0.5% Ferry, Bundaberg Regional Council: 0.0% Tram, Bundaberg Regional Council: 0.0% Truck, Bundaberg Regional Council: 0.9% Motorbike/Motor scooter, Bundaberg Regional Council: 1.0% Bicycle, Bundaberg Regional Council: 0.7% Taxi/Other, Bundaberg Regional Council: 0.1% Other - multiple methods, Bundaberg Regional Council: 1.0% Worked at home, Bundaberg Regional Council: 5.3% Did not go to work, Bundaberg Regional Council: 8.8% Not stated, Bundaberg Regional Council: 1.2%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2016
Compiled and presented in economy.id by .id, the population experts.
Change in local workers method of travel to work, 2011 to 2016
Change in local workers method of travel to work, 2011 to 2016 Car, as driver, Bundaberg Regional Council: +1,387 Car, as passenger, Bundaberg Regional Council: -215 Train, Bundaberg Regional Council: +4 Bus, Bundaberg Regional Council: -76 Ferry, Bundaberg Regional Council: -1 Tram, Bundaberg Regional Council: 0 Truck, Bundaberg Regional Council: -111 Motorbike/Motor scooter, Bundaberg Regional Council: -53 Bicycle, Bundaberg Regional Council: -113 Taxi/Other, Bundaberg Regional Council: -19 Other - multiple methods, Bundaberg Regional Council: -59 Worked at home, Bundaberg Regional Council: -127 Did not go to work, Bundaberg Regional Council: -185 Not stated, Bundaberg Regional Council: -158
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2011 and 2016
Compiled and presented in economy.id by .id, the population experts.

Dominant groups

In 2016, there were 185 people in the who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in Bundaberg Regional Council, compared with 24,584 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).

Analysis of the method of travel to work of the in the Bundaberg Regional Council in 2016 compared to Queensland shows that 0.6% used public transport, while 78.5% used a private vehicle, compared with 6.8% and 70.6% respectively in Queensland.

The major differences between the method of travel to work of the workforce in the Bundaberg Regional Council and Queensland were:

  • A larger percentage of local workers who travelled by car (as driver) (70.8% compared to 64.3%)
  • A larger percentage of local workers who travelled by car (as a passenger) (6.8% compared to 5.3%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who travelled by train (0.1% compared to 3.2%)
  • A smaller percentage of local workers who travelled by bus (0.5% compared to 3.4%)

Emerging groups

The largest changes in the method of travel of work of the workforce in the Bundaberg Regional Council between 2011 and 2016 were:

  • Car, as driver (+1,387 local workers)
  • Car, as passenger (-215 local workers)
  • Did not go to work (-185 local workers)
  • Worked at home (-127 local workers)

v19.08.22-1.0.0