Northern Tasmania Region
Local workers - Individual income quartiles - All industries
Individual Income is an indicator of socio-economic status, skills and occupations required in a particular industry. With other data sources, such as Qualifications and Occupation, it helps to evaluate the economic opportunities of people in an industry.
Income quartiles are used to condense income categories into manageable units, adjust for the effects of inflation, and allow areas to be compared over time relative to a benchmark. The incomes for a specified industry for the state are split into four equal groups, each containing 25% of the workers in that industry, and the quartiles allow users to compare changes in that industry in the local area to changes statewide, or against another benchmark. For more information on how quartiles are calculated please refer to the data notes.
As well as being related to the type of jobs and qualifications required in a particular industry, income levels can be related to the level of part-time employment, Occupations, Qualifications and the Age structure of the local workers, so the data should be looked at in conjunction with these topics.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2011 and 2016 – by place of work
|Local workers individual income quartiles|
|Northern Tasmania Region - All industries||2016||2011||Change|
|Quartile group||Number||%||Tasmania||Number||%||Tasmania||2011 - 2016|
Please refer to specific data notes for more information
|Quartile group dollar ranges (Individuals)|
|Calculated from income data for Tasmania||Weekly income by Census year|
|Individual quartile ranges||2016||2011|
|Lowest group||$0 to $562||$0 to $494|
|Medium lowest||$563 to $894||$495 to $791|
|Medium highest||$895 to $1,358||$792 to $1,199|
|Highest group||$1,359 and over||$1,200 and over|
Income quartiles allow us to compare relative income-earning capabilities across time. Analysis of the distribution of the workers by income quartile compared to Tasmania shows that there was lesser proportion of in the highest income quartile, and a greater proportion in the lowest income quartile.
The most significant change for the local workers between 2011 and 2016 was in the "lowest group" quartile which showed an decrease of 338 people.