Hawkesbury City

economic profile

hawkesbury logo

Hawkesbury City

Resident workers - Method of travel to work - All industries

Within Hawkesbury City, there is a lower proportion of resident All industries workers using public transport to get to work than the New South Wales workforce.

Maximising access to employment is a key objective in any economic development strategy. Understanding the modes of transport Hawkesbury City's local resident workers use (either within or outside the local area), informs decision-makers about the effectiveness of transport modes, routes and availability of local public transport.

There are a number of reasons why people use different Modes of Transport to get to work including:

  • The availability of affordable and effective public transport options between place of residence and place of work;
  • The number of motor vehicles available within a household; and
  • The travel distance to work, which for example, can allow people to walk or bicycle to their place of employment.

Method of Travel to Work data should be viewed in conjunction with resident place of work for a clearer picture of where working residents are employed.

Data source

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) – Census 2011 (experimental imputed) & 2016 – by place of work

Select industry:
Current benchmark:
  • Excel
  • Word
Resident workers method of travel to work
Hawkesbury City 20162011Change
Main method of travelNumber%. New South Wales%Number%. New South Wales%2011 - 2016
Car, as driver22,42169.457.820,94767.257.6+1,474
Car, as passenger1,2733.94.31,3444.35.0-71
Motorbike/Motor scooter1570.50.61550.50.6+2
Other - multiple methods3701.11.23411.11.1+29
Walked only6121.93.98312.74.1-219
Worked at home1,7315.44.81,5945.14.6+137
Did not go to work2,6808.38.72,9499.59.5-269
Not stated3291.01.04461.41.5-117
Total 32,327100.0100.031,171100.0100.0+1,156

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2011 and 2016. Compiled and presented by .id the population experts

Please refer to specific data notes for more information
loading animation
loading animation

Dominant groups

In 2016, there were 1,729 resident workers who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in Hawkesbury City, compared with 24,741 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).

Analysis of the method of travel to work of the resident workers in Hawkesbury City shows that 5.3% used public transport, while 76.5% used a private vehicle, compared with 15.9% and 63.7% respectively in New South Wales.

The major differences between the method of travel to work of the resident workers in Hawkesbury City and the New South Wales workforce were:

  • A larger percentage of resident workers who travelled by car, as driver (69.4% compared to 57.8%)
  • A smaller percentage of resident workers who travelled by train (4.9% compared to 11.2%)
  • A smaller percentage of resident workers who travelled by bus (0.5% compared to 4.4%)
  • A smaller percentage of resident workers who walked only (1.9% compared to 3.9%)

Emerging groups

The largest changes in the method of travel to work of the resident workers in Hawkesbury City between 2011 and 2016 were:

  • Car, as driver (+1,474 resident workers)
  • Train (+279 resident workers)
  • Did not go to work (-269 resident workers)
  • Walked only (-219 resident workers)

To continue building your economic story go to...

Hawkesbury City

economic profile